Phil Lucht Math & Physics Archive
Home / Math and Physics Files / Math / Sneddon / Sned p203 Ku=mu u and the Lk=delta problem Jim et al / Lg=d done with Jim and sent to Jim

jim delta 1_13_11

DOCX · 19.5 KB
Open DOCX file

A short note from Phil to Jim, dated 1/13/11 by file name, discussing Jim's proposed operator solution of Lxy(1/r) = 2π δ(2)(r) = δ(r)/r. It fixes a dimensional error, rewrites the 2D Laplacian in polar form, and uses limits and the divergence theorem to show the two terms cancel. It then gives two separate candidate operators and notes an added angular term. A comment says the Maple-derived operator forms are wrong. The text is partly garbled.

AI-written summary; may contain errors. This description is approximate.

Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
Jim, 1. I think you proposed by phone that a solution to Lxy(1/r) = 2π δ(2)(r) might be this Lxy([1/r]) = (1/ (∂x2+∂y2)( [1/r] ) = 2π δ(2)(r) = δ(r)/r But dimensionally this says L-3 = L-2, so I think what you intended was: Lxy([1/r]) = (∂x2+∂y2)( ([1/r]) = 2π δ(2)(r) = δ(r)/r 2. Assuming this is what you meant, you are then claiming this (perhaps apart from a constant) 22D(r[1/r]) = 2π δ(2)(r) = δ(r)/r where 22D = ∂x2+∂y2 is the 2D Laplacian. In cylindrical coordinates we know that 3D2 = r-1∂r(r ∂r ) + r-2∂φ2 + ∂z2 So for polar coordinates r and φ it must be true that 2D2 = ∂x2+∂y2 = r-1∂r(r ∂r ) + r-2∂φ2 Therefore 22DF(r) = r-1∂r(r ∂r F(r) ) = r-1( r ∂r2F(r) + ∂rF(r)) = ∂r2F(r) + r-1 ∂rF(r) Let's take F(r) = r[1/r] so this then says 22D(r[1/r]) = ∂r2(r[1/r]) + (1/r) ∂r(r[1/r]) Thus, a new term has been added to your original proposal which was just ∂r2(r[1/r]). 3. Using my Part 2 methods of the last doc, I was able to show these interesting facts: limε→0 ∂r2(r[1 /]) = – 2π δ(2)(r) limε→0 {(1/r)∂r(r [1/]) } = + 2π δ(2)(r) After doing this, I realized that it was obvious from the divergence theorem applied to ψ, ∫V dV 2ψ = ∫S dS ∂nψ which applied to a 2D disk of radius a says !Syntax Error, Irdr !Syntax Error, Idθ 2ψ = a!Syntax Error, Idθ ∂rψ Setting ψ = r [1/r] we get !Syntax Error, Irdr !Syntax Error, Idθ 2(r [1/r]) = a!Syntax Error, Idθ ∂r(r [1/r])|r=a = a!Syntax Error, Idθ ∂r(1) = 0 So that 2(r [1/r]) = 0 4. So the bad news is that your two terms exactly cancel so that Lxy (1/r) = 22D (r[1/r]) = – 2π δ(2)(r) + 2π δ(2)(r) = 0 The good news is that we now have two different solutions to the problem which are these - ∂r2(r [1/r]) = 2π δ(2)(r) = δ(r)/r +(1/r)∂r(r[1/r]) = 2π δ(2)(r) = δ(r)/r which correspond to (Maple) // this stuff is wrong, see Question #2 doc review Lxy(1) = - (1/[ x2 ∂x2 + y2∂y2 +2xy∂x∂y + 2x∂x + 2y∂y ] Lxy(2) = +(1/)[ x2(∂x2+∂y2) + y2(∂x2+∂y2) + 2x∂x + 2y∂y] and any linear combination must also be viable. If we add these two we get, for example, Lxy(3) = +(1/)[ x2∂y2 + y2∂x2 – 2xy∂x∂y] = (1/) (x∂y- y∂x)2 But since ∂φ = (∂φy)∂y + (∂φx)∂x = (x∂y -y∂x), we get Lxy(3) = (1/r) ∂φ2 and this is just the kind of term we know we can add in since Lxy(3 F(r) = 0.