Home / Math and Physics Files / Math / Sneddon / Sned p203 Ku=mu u and the Lk=delta problem Jim et al / Lg=d done with Jim and sent to Jim
my 1st response to Jims 1st proposed L
DOCX · 17.8 KB
Open DOCX file
Correspondence from Phil to Jim about finding a linear differential operator L in two dimensions with L(1/r) = δ(x)δ(y). Phil examines Jim's suggested Lf = r ∂r²(rf) and a revised version dated 1.11.11, pointing out dimensional mismatches and his inability to verify the result against a test function φ(r). He starts an integration over -ε to ε to probe the revision. Part of the equation text is garbled.
AI-written summary; may contain errors.
Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
Jim,
I am looking for a solution to this equation
L(1/r) = δ(2)(r) = δ(x)δ(y) r = (x,y) r =
where L is some differential operator in 2 dimensions, presumably a linear differential operator.
I have thought about your suggestion that perhaps Lf = r ∂r2(rf) so this would say
r ∂r2(r[1/r] ) = constant * δ(2)(r) r = (x,y) r =
First of all, assuming "constant" has no dimensions, the dimensions of the equation are wrong since they say (length)-1 = (length)-2.
Apart from that detail, I agree that for r > 0, the equation is true since 0 = 0, but I am unable to
see why this would be true for some arbitrary "test function" φ(r),
!Syntax Error, I rdr φ(r) r ∂r2(r[1/r] ) = constant * φ(0)
You mentioned doing some limiting procedure, but I don't know how to do that.
So I continue to be mystified by this little problem.
-Phil
__________________________________________________________
Jim modified his suggestion on 1.11.11 to be this:
(1/r) ∂r2(r[1/r] ) = δ(r)
This has two problems. First, the dimensions are still wrong since we have L-3 = L-1 . I could fix that up by saying
∂r2(r[1/r] ) = δ(r)/r
What happens if we integrate this from -ε to ε?
!Syntax Error, Idr ∂r2(r[1/r] ) = !Syntax Error, Idr δ(r)/r