Stak Exercise 7_11 scraps
DOCX · 24.9 KB
Open DOCX file
Working notes by Phil (dated 4.5.11) collecting abandoned attempts at Stakgold Exercise 7.11 on the heat equation in all of R^n. He uses the Green's function g and a spatial average over a sphere of radius r, applies the divergence theorem, bounds the Gaussian integrals, and lets r go to infinity. He also records contradictions he hit and comments on doubts about interchanging integrals. The text is partly garbled by equation-conversion errors.
AI-written summary; may contain errors. This description is approximate.
Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
Snippets from failed Exercise 7.11 attempts PhL 4.5.11
If we can show that our double integral converges, then it converges to something which is independent of r. Assuming we can show this, we then have
|∂t<u(x,t)>| ≤ (rn-1/Vn(r)) K(t)
But we know that Vn(r) ~ rn so this then says
|∂t<u(x,t)>| ≤ (1/r) K'(t)
We then take our limit r→ ∞ and we get |∂t<u(x,t)>| = 0 which says ∂t<u(x,t)> = 0 which says the spatial average of temperature remains a constant. So we "make it by one power".
Exercise 7.11 Average Temperature is a constant in time.
In this problem we are asked about the nature of a solution u(x,t) of the heat equation where our region of interest is all space, that is, R = Rn in Stak notation. Since there are no boundaries and no sources, equation (7.14) has only the f(x0) term. This would be true for (7.14 gen) where we had different spatial BC's, because both surface integrals will be zero at r = ∞. [ Is this justified for the surface integrals? I guess if we assume g = C as we do later below, we could show these surface integrals vanish.]
So we start off then with
u(x,t) = ∫dx0 g(x,t|x0,0) f(x0) t>0
Now I think I can create a contradiction as follows. Given the above, we get
∂t u(x,t) = ∫dx0 ∂t g(x,t|x0,0) f(x0) t>0
Now if we adopt the (7.8a) "picture" for g, we can replace ∂t above with x2 and we then get
∂t u(x,t) = ∫dx0 x2g(x,t|x0,0) f(x0)
We cannot transfer ∂x to ∂x0 as we might for a convolution-form kernel. Thus, this does not fit the form of any divergence theorem. So I guess I cannot make a contradiction here as I thought. Now, let's repeat the above doing a spatial average first. To do this, assume a sphere of radius r (in n dimensions) and then we have
<u(x,t)> = (1/Vn(r)) ∫dx0 f(x0) ∫dx g(x,t|x0,0)
Now take the time derivative to get
∂t<u(x,t)> = (1/V(r)) ∫dx0 f(x0) ∫dx ∂tg(x,t|x0,0)
Again we adopt the (7.8a) "picture" for g and replace ∂t with x2 to get
∂t<u(x,t)> = (1/V(r)) ∫dx0 f(x0) ∫dx x2g(x,t|x0,0)
Now we CAN apply our simple divergence theorem ∫V dV 2φ = ∫S dS ∂nφ to write this as
∂t<u(x,t)> = (1/V(r)) ∫dx0 f(x0) ∫S dS ∂n g(x,t|x0,0) x on sphere radius r
Now we know that g(x,t|x0,0) is the temperature resulting from f(x) = δ(x-x0) in our (7.8a) picture. In fact, we know it is g = C as in 7.10. We can see from 7.10 that C decays strongly far away (gaussian decay). Specifically,
∫S dS ∂n g(x,t|x0,0) = (4πt)-n/2 ∫S dS ∂n exp(-|x-x0|2/4t) x is moving point on the surface
Now we have sort of the crucial issue I think. We integrate over a sphere that we will make large soon, but the point x0 is offset from its center. No matter how large we make r, we always have to worry about the point x0 being close to the surface of the sphere. That is to say, f(x0) could extent to infinity in our initial condition statement. So just keep this in mind please. I will formalize our fixed sphere to write
∫S dS ∂n g(x,t|x0,0) = (4πt)-n/2 ∫S dS ∂n exp(-|x-x0|2/4t)
= (4πt)-n/2 rn-1∫dΩn ∂r exp(-|x-x0|)2/4t)
We then have
∂t<u(x,t)> = (4πt)-n/2 (rn-1/V(r)) ∫dx0 f(x0) ∫dΩn ∂r exp(-|x-x0|)2/4t)
and now we have things looking good! The next step is to say
|∂t<u(x,t)>| = (4πt)-n/2 (rn-1/V(r)) ∫dx0 |f(x0)| ∫dΩn ∂r exp(-|x-x0|2/4t)
≤ (4πt)-n/2 (rn-1/V(r)) M ∫all dy ∫dΩn ∂r exp(-|x-y|2/4t)
where r = |x| and dΩn refers to a solid angle pencil passing from center of sphere to point x. I argue now that since nothing blows up anywhere, we are free to interchange orders of our various operators. Then
I ≡ ∫all dy ∫dΩn ∂r exp(-|x-y|2/4t) = ∫dΩn ∂r { ∫all dy exp(-|y-x|2/4t) }
The bracketed integral is just this, where we define y' = y-x and dy' = dy
∫all dy exp(-|x-y|)2/4t) = ∫all dy exp(-|y'|)2/4t) = ∫all dy' exp(-|y'|)2/4t)
= Sn(1) !Syntax Error, Ids exp(-s2/4t) = Sn(1) // Maple
where for our full-space dy' integral we use s as the radial coordinate. What we learn here is that our internal integral J = ∫all dy exp(-|x-y|)2/4t) appears at first to depend on x (and on r = |x| ), but since it is an all space integral
∫all dy exp(-|x-y|2/4t)
Consider this double integral.
I = ∫dx0 ∫dΩxn ∂n exp(-|x-x0|2/4t) = ∫all dy ∫dΩx ∂nx exp(-|x-y|2/4t)
This is a slightly tricky situation to understand.(1) dΩx is a piece of solid angle passing through the sphere on which point x lies; (2) ∂nx is really ∂r for this sphere; (3) r = |x| of course. (4) I don't really know much about dΩx in n dimensions, but I do know there is always a polar angle. Not sure whether this detailed information is needed here. So write again as
I = ∫all dy∫dΩx ∂r exp(-|x-y|2/4t)
Plan A: suppose we try to slide the dy integral to the right, we then get
I = ∫all dy∫dΩ ∂r ∫all dy exp(-|x-y|2/4t)
which at least has a well defined meaning. But at this point, why can we not define y' = y-x and replace
∫all dy exp(-|x-y|)2/4t) = ∫all dy exp(-|y'|)2/4t) = ∫all dy' exp(-|y'|)2/4t)
= Sn(1) !Syntax Error, Ids exp(-s2/4t) = Sn(1) // Maple
Then we find that ∂r Sn(1) = 0 and therefore I = 0. This just does not "smell good". Let's try it some other way and see if we still get 0.
|x-y|2 = x2 + y2-2x.y = r2 + y2 - 2rycosγ
∂r|x-y|2 = 2r - 2ycosγ
∂r exp(-|x-y|2/4t) = exp(-|x-y|2/4t) (-1/4t) (2r - 2ycosγ)
Then we have
I = ∫all dy∫dΩx ∂r exp(-|x-y|2/4t) = (-1/2t) ∫all dy∫dΩx exp(-|x-y|2/4t) (r - ycosγ)
and we have disposed of our ∂n derivative at the cost of picking up the factor shown. If we NOW move the y integral to the right, what happens? What do we do with this integral
∫all dy y exp(-|x-y|2/4t)
∫all dy
∂nx exp(-|x-y|)2/4t) = n x exp(-|x-y|)2/4t) = ∂r exp(-|x-y|)2/4t)
∂r = ∂rxi ∂i
and now I am more concerned that this is a function of r since x lies on the sphere of radius r. Since r is finite at this point, I could define y' = y-x to get
I = - ∫all dy' ∫dΩx ∂ny' exp(-|y'|)2/4t)
If we center a sphere on our point x0 then C ~ exp(-r2/4t) and ∂rC ~ exp(-r2/4t) (-2r/4t) which still has this decay. Now since dSn = rn-1dΩn, the integral
∫S dS ∂n g(x,t|x0,0) ~ rn-1 Sn(1) exp(-r2/4t) (-2r/4t) = ~ rn exp(-r2/4t)
where I ignore constants and powers of t (think of t constant for the moment). f we move our origin back to x0 we get
∫S dS ∂n g(x,t|x0,0) ~ |x-x0|n exp(-|x-x0|2/4t) x on sphere of radius r
where x is a point on the sphere of radius r, and then we have
∂t<u(x,t)> ~ (1/Vn(r)) ∫dx0 f(x0){ |x-x0|n exp(-|x-x0|2/4t) }
Now we can use the fact that f(x0) is "bounded" by M, say, so
|∂t<u(x,t)>| ~ (1/Vn(r)) ∫dx0 |f(x0)| { |x-x0|n exp(-|x-x0|2/4t) }
≤ (1/Vn(r)) K(t) M ∫dx0{ |x-x0|n exp(-|x-x0|2/4t) } (*)
Now for this spatial integral, put the origin back at the center and use dx0 = rndr dΩn to get
∫dx0{ |x-x0|n exp(-|x-x0|2/4t) } = Sn(1) ∫ dr r2n exp(-r2/4t) // Maple
= Sn(1)(1/2) Γ(n+1/2) (4t)n+1/2 = independent of radius r ≡ K'(t)
We have then shown that
|∂t<u(x,t)>| ≤ (1/Vn(r)) K(t) M K'(t) = (1/rn) f(n,t)
Now as we let r→ ∞, we get |∂t<u(x,t)>| = 0 which says ∂t<u(x,t)> = 0 which says the spatial average of temperature remains a constant. This argument could have been applied at equation (*) since the only r dependence is in V.
<u(t) > = ∫dx ∫dx0 g(x,t|x0,0) f(x0) = ∫dx0 f(x0) ∫dx g(x,t|x0,0)
∂t<u(t) > = ∫dx0 f(x0) ∫dx ∂tg(x,t|x0,0) = ∫dx0 f(x0) ∫dx 2g(x,t|x0,0)
= ∫dx0 f(x0) ∫S dS ∂ng(x,t|x0,0) = ∫dx0 f(x0) { 0 }
because g and all its derivatives → 0 as we go to r→∞. There is no boundary. But by this same argument I could show that
u(x,t) = ∫dx0 g(x,t|x0,0) f(x0)
∂t u(x,t) = ∫dx0 ∂t g(x,t|x0,0) f(x0) = ∫dx02g(x,t|x0,0) f(x0) = 0
which we know is wrong. Remember that (∂t - 2) g(x,t|x0,0) = δ(x-x0)δ(t) in the (7.8) "picture" and not 0. So redoing the above line we get
∂t u(x,t) = ∫dx0 ∂t g(x,t|x0,0) f(x0) = ∫dx0 δ(x-x0)δ(t) f(x0) = δ(t)f(x)
But this is also obviously wrong.
Suppose we take u(x,t) as given in p 214 (7.56) which applies for the u = 0 on σ BC.
u(x,t) = Σi fiφi(x) exp(-λit)
The spatial average would then be
<u(t) > = ∫dx u(x,t) = fi exp(-λit) ∫dx φi(x)
It is not obvious what to do with ∫dx φi(x) since we don't know that 1 is an EF. So let's try a time derivative
∂t<u(t) > = Σi ∫dx φi(x) ∂t exp(-λit) = Σi exp(-λit)∫dx φi(x) (-λi)
= Σi exp(-λit) ∫dx 2φi(x) = Σi exp(-λit) ∫S dS ∂nφi
but I am not getting anywhere, nothing to do next.
Exercise 7.11 Average Temperature is a constant in time.
In order to even talk about "average temperature" we have to restrict to a sphere of radius r which at least has some measureable finite volume. Then in the end we might take r→∞. With such a finite sphere, we do have spatial boundaries to worry about. Our generalized equation (7.14) says
u(t,x) = !Syntax Error, Idt0 !Syntax Error, Idnx0 g(x|x0) q(t0,x0)
+ !Syntax Error, Idnx0 {u(0,x0) g(x|x0)}|t0=0]
+ !Syntax Error, Idt0 !Syntax Error, I dSn0 [ u(t0,x0){-∂nx0 g(x|x0)} + g(x|x0)∂n0u(t0,x0) ] (7.14 gen)
Now we are allowed to exclude internal sources in this problem, meaning q = 0, so we get
u(t,x) = !Syntax Error, Idnx0 {u(0,x0) g(x|x0)}|t0=0]
+ !Syntax Error, Idt0 !Syntax Error, I dSn0 [ u(t0,x0){-∂nx0 g(x|x0)} + g(x|x0)∂n0u(t0,x0) ]
where σn is a spherical shell or radius r in n dimensions.