Errata for Stakgold Boundary Value Problems of Mathematical Physics old
PDF · 5 pages · 64.8 KB
Open PDF file
Errata list written by Phil Lucht (last updated December 7, 2011) for the 1967-68 Macmillan editions of I. Stakgold's two volumes. It explains his reasons for compiling it and marks with an asterisk the errors that persist in the 2000 SIAM edition. Entries are given by chapter and page, with corrections to equations, typos and wrong references, from Volume I Chapter 2 through Volume II Chapter 7.
AI-written summary; may contain errors.
Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
1
Errata for Stakgold Boundary Value Problems of Mathematical Ph ysics
Phil Lucht
Rimrock Digital Technology, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
last update: December 7, 2011
These errata are for the following two books, both blue-covered hardbacks in the Macmillan Series in
Advanced Mathematics and Theoretical Physics,
I. Stakgold, Boundary Value Problems of Mathematical Physics
Volume I, 1967, sixth printing 1972 (Macmillan, London) (Chapters 1 through 4)
Volume II, 1968, second printing 1971 (Macmillan, London) (Chapter s 5 through 8)
The books were reprinted in 2000 in a SIAM edition with correctio ns, but some errata managed to escape
detection as noted below.
These "errata" are just items I happened to notice while w orking my way through the first 7 chapters
of this two volume set (Chapter 8 will have to wait). I bought these books in 1972 while taking Math 224
at UC Berkeley, but only recently was I able to find time to read them!
My reasons for creating this errata list are as foll ows:
(1) these wonderful books should be preserved indefinitely in the best possible working condition.
(2) The books are excellent but are also somewhat difficul t in places, requiring the reader to do many
calculational steps between "waypoints" given by the author. When there are errors in those waypoints,
the student having a finite amount of time may give up or at l east be quite discouraged.
(3) Someone who borrows these volumes from a library is likely to get the original editions, not the new
editions which have most items corrected.
(4) Even the new 2000 editions continue to have some errata.
(5) I could find no existing errata on line.
I understand probably better than most why the author decided to put out a more condensed version of the
book ( called Green's Functions and Boundary Value Problems now in a 3rd edition Wiley 2011) which
"could be covered in a one-year course" as he says in his P reface. Ah, but if you really want to know the
nuts and bolts inside the machine, I would recommend the long version.
Any of my errata of course could be erroneous, for which I apologize ahead of time. Some errata are
trivial typos hardly worth mentioning, but since I marked them in my book, they might as well get
recorded here.
An asterisk * after the page number indicates an erratum not fixed in the 2000 SIAM edition.
2 Volume I.
Chapter 1
none
Chapter 2
p 136* 9th line down should say We are to show T[x n] → T[x] // not → [Tx]
p 146 4th line from the bottom should say in (2.34) below // no t (2.33)
p 163 5th line from bottom should say I 4[φ1] = | µ1| // not = | λ1|
p 176 first line should say ∫0 t du [ y(u) ... // not ∫0 t dt [ y(u) ...
p 176* equ (IV) at bottom should say y(1) = 0 // n ot x(1) = 0
p 184 mid page should say The second boundary....if 0 = ∫0 1 e-λξ f( ξ)d ξ . // not ∫0 t
Chapter 3
p 204 2nd last line should say ..for the solution of the inhom ogeneous ... // not homogeneous
Chapter 4
p 299* equ (4.83a) β0 in last term should be b 0 to match b 0 in (4.82a) and earlier discussion.
This was changed in 2000 so that all terms show β0, but all should show b 0.
p 303* last equ should have g ^ = – ( α12+α22)-1[ ψ.... // not ( α12+α22)[ ψ
p 314* 2nd para should begin Each possible... of A in (4.125a) y ields // not of A is (4.125a)
p 315 1st equ bracket factor should be [ γ + log( λ /2)] // not [ ( γ + log( λ ))/2 ]
p 315* 1st equ in Ex 4.26 should have ρ replaced by x in two places so then has x < and x > .
Volume II
Chapter 5
p 38* 2nd equ in Ex 5.18 should have factor (-iu) p // not (-iu) n
3 p 56 last equ on page, integration variable should be d αn // not d α
Chapter 6
p 94 below equation number (6.10) should read expression // not exprersion
p 131 equ (6.75) should begin with g(x| ξ) = // not g(x)| ξ) =
p 132 Theorem 4 in bold type should read Theorem 3 (Theorem 4 is on page 133).
p 144 Ex 6.30, 6th line up from bottom should say Z = z R // not Z = zR
p 145* 2nd equation should say u m,n,k = (1/ r ) J n+(1/2) // not (1/r) J n+(1/2)
p 147 1st equ after EXAMPLE should end with = -(1/4 π) log (1+r 2-2rcos θ) // log is missing
p 158 2nd equ on page (one after Thus) is missing a factor sin(m πx/a), but OK in (6.117).
p 161* Eq (6.122) integration variable should be d α and not dx.
p 165* 2nd last equ begins ww ‾ = EE‾ ( num/denom) : last signs in both num and denom should be +
instead of –.
p 166* Ex 6.36 should say By the calculus of residues // not calculus residues
p 166 last equ should have integration variable d α // not d ξ
p 168* equ (6.132) left side should read g(r, φ | r 0,0) = // not g(r, θ | r 0,0) =
p 171 equ (6.137) left side should read h(r, φ | r 0, 0) = A + ... // not h(r, φ | r 0, φ0)
p 179* 3rd line of text should say According to (6.195) in Exerc ise 6.47
and not According to (6.192) in Exercise 6.48 two typos here
the second typo is fixed in the 2000 SIAM edition
p 179* 5th equ, last bracket should be [ c 0 – (1/2 π) log a] // not [ c 0 (1/2 π) log a]
p 183* 4th equ bracket should be [ R2-r02
2a + a
2 ] // not [ R2-r02
2 + a
2 ]
p 183* 5th equ should say I(s) = – 1
4πaR 3 [..] // not I(s) = – 1
4πR3 [..]
p 187* last equ on page should read u(s–) – u i(s–) = // not u(s–) – u i s–) =
4 Chapter 7
p 213 1st sentence after heading should say for the heat equation // not equaton
p 218 6th line of text should say Alternatively, we use (7.57) // not (7.47)
p 218 2nd last equ should have q~(x,s) + f(x) // not g~(x,s)
p 230 1st equ should have factor (2/ l) before the Σ // as in equ (7.50)
p 237* 4th line of text should say of strength 4 π/3 // not strength 4 π
p 240 Ex 7.10 equ should have factor 4πn
l2 // not 4πn
l
p 242* 3rd line of text above Ex 7.17 should say Fourier sine tran sform // not cosine transform
p 242* last equ : The two functions H (0) and Z 0 are strangely in reverse order. Everywhere else in the
book the x < function is put on the left of the x > function.
p 243 the 4th equ should have – δ(x-ξ)/x on the left // not δ(x-ξ)/x
p 243 the 6th equ left side should be – f(x) // not f(x)
p 243 the 6th equ should have F w(µ) added to the integrand
p 248* 4th equ should have factors f 2,k and then f 1,k // not f 1,k then f 2,k
p 250 last integral in (7.122) should have a + (1/2) ∫ // not – (1/2) ∫
p 252* 4th equ, the integration should be ∫0 t0 // not ∫0 t
p 254 the K = equation should have f 1(x) in the integrand // not f(x)
p 258 the w k = triplet above (7.137) should have sinh and sin // not cosh and cos
p 260 1st of equ (7.141) triplet, should have – ∇2ν = 0 // not – ∂2ν/∂x2 = 0
p 270* 2nd line should read in (7.163) and // not in (7.164) and
p 271* equ (7.170) is missing the H α(1) (λ r > ) factor which appears in (7.169)
5 p 273* equ (7.176) should contain factor f~(γ) // not f–(γ)
p 273 text line above equ 7.177 should say by K iγ(kr) // not by rK iγ(kr)
p 273* last equation should have sinh( πγ ) // not sin(k γπ )
p 275* Equ after At φ=0 we have should have sinh( γπ ) // not sin( γπ )
p 275* Equ after At φ=2 π, should have sinh( γπ ) // not sin( γπ )
p 275* the equ after We deduce that should read
ν~ = – cosh[ γ(φ-π)]
γ sinh(2γπ ) K iγ(kr 0) // not the very different expression shown.
p 277 equ (7.192) the radical in the left side exponent should be r2 + z 2 , not r2 - z 2
p 279* equ after (7.200), the radical exponent should be r2 + z 2 , not r2 - z 2 . This is OK in the
following equation.
p 289* first equ in the In Region I: should read 0 , 0 < t < R // the 0, is missing
In other words it should look the way it looks for Region II.
p 317* start of 2nd paragraph should read let a( ω) = 1/(1+ ω2) // not 1/1+ ω2
p 318 4th equ, left side should be b +(ω)/b -(ω) // not b +(ω) + b -(ω)
p 319 first equ should have 2 in the numerator // not 1 in numerator
p 321* 2nd line of text should say the integral by closing the contour // not by choosing the contour
p 322 equ (7.300), the factor 1/(2 ξ) in the first integral should be 1/(2 π)
p 325* first line of text should say Setting α = -iR // not α = iR
p 330 Ex 7.54, 2nd equ should have leading factor π/p+k // not π/(p+k)