Phil Lucht Math & Physics Archive
Home / Math and Physics Files / Math / Wedge World / fiber bundles

no author - connections_chapter2_2

PDF · 26 pages · 400.7 KB
Open PDF file

Book chapter with no stated author, apparently from a text on connections. It opens with examples such as tangent, cotangent and tensor bundles, distributions, a complex line bundle over S^3 and the Mobius line bundle. It then gives the formal definition of a vector bundle with local trivializations and sections, and the contents list further sections on smoothness, bundle operations, metrics, symplectic structures, G-structures, fiber bundles and principal bundles. Only the first part of the text was seen.

AI-written summary; may contain errors. This description is approximate.

Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
Chapter 2 Bundles Contents 2.1Vector bundles ...................17 2.2Smoothness .....................26 2.3Operations onvector bundles ..........28 2.4Vector bundles withstructure ..........33 2.4.1 Complex structures ................33 2.4.2 Bundle metrics ..................35 2.4.3 Volume forms andvolume elemen ts.......37 2.4.4 Inde nite metrics .................43 2.4.5 Symplectic structures ..............45 2.4.6 Arbitrary G-structures ..............48 2.5In nite dimensional bundles ...........49 2.6General berbundles ...............56 2.7Structure groups ..................59 2.8Principal bundles .................63 2.1Vector bundles: de nitions andexam- ples Roughly speaking, asmoothvectorbundle isafamily ofvectorspaces that are\attac hed"toamanifold insome smoothly varying manner. Wewill presen tthisideamorerigorously inDe nition 2.8below.Firstthough, it's worthlooking atsome examples tounderstand whysuchanobjectmight beofinterest. 1718 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Example 2.1(Thetangen tbundle ).IfMisasmoothn-dimensional manifold, itstangen tbundle TM=[ x2MTxM associates toeveryx2Mthen-dimensional vector spaceTxM.Allof these vector spaces areisomorphic (obviously ,since theyhavethesame dimension), though it'simportanttonotethatthereisgenerally nonatural choice ofisomorphism betweenTxMandTyMforx6=y.There ishowever asense inwhichtheassociation ofx2Mwiththevector spaceTxMcan bethough tofasa\smooth"function ofx.We'llbemore precise about thislater, butintuitivelyonecanimagineMasthesphereS2,embedded smoothlyinR3.Then eachtangen tspace isa2-dimensional subspace ofR3, andtheplanesTxS2R3varysmoothly asxvariesoverS2.Ofcourse, the de nition of\smoothness" forabundle should ideally notdependonany embedding ofMinalarger space, justasthesmoothmanifold structure ofMisindependen tofanysuchembedding. Thegeneral de nition will havetore ect this. Instandard bundle terminology ,thetangen tbundle isanexample ofa smoothvectorbundleofranknoverM.WecallMthebaseofthisbundle, andthe2n-dimensional manifoldTMitselfiscalled itstotalspace.There isanatural projection map:TM!Mwhich,foreachx2M,sends everyvectorX2TxMtox.Thepreimages1(x)=TxMarecalled bers ofthebundle, forreasons thatmightnotbeobvious atthisstage, butwill become moresoasweseemore examples. Example 2.2(Trivialbundles ).Thisisthesimplest andleastinteresting example ofavectorbundle, butisnonetheless important.Foranymanifold Mofdimensionn,letE=MRmforsomem2N.Thisisamanifold ofdimensionn+m,withanatural projection map :MRm!M:(x;v)7!x: Weassociatewitheverypointx2MthesetEx:=1(x)=fxgRm, whichiscalled the beroverxandcarries thestructure ofarealm- dimensional vector space. ThemanifoldsEandM,together withthe projection map:E!M,arecollectiv elycalled thetrivial realvector bundleofrankmoverM.Anymaps:M!Eoftheform s(x)=(x;f(x)) iscalled asection ofthebundle:E!M;heref:M!Rmisan arbitrary map. Theterminology comes fromthegeometric interpretation oftheimages(M)Easa\cross section" ofthespaceMRm.Sections canalsobecharacterized asmapss:M!Esuchthats=IdM,a de nition whichwillgeneralize nicely toother bundles. 2.1.VECTOR BUNDLES 19 Remark 2.3.Awordaboutnotation beforewecontinue:sincetheessential information ofavector bundle iscontained intheprojection map,one usually denotes abundle by\:E!M".Thisnotation isconvenient because italsomentionsthemanifoldsEandM,thetotalspaceandbase respectively.When there's noambiguit y,weoftenomititselfanddenote abundle simply byE!M,orevenjustE. Consider foronemore momen tthe rstexample, thetangen tbundle :TM!M.Asection ofthebundle:TM!Misnowde ned tobe anymaps:M!TMthatassociates witheachx2Mavector inthe berTxM;equivalently,s:M!TMisasection ifs=IdM.Thus \section ofthetangen tbundle" issimply another termforavector eld onM.Wedenote thespace ofvector elds byVec(M). IfMisasurface embedded inR3,thenitisnatural tothink ofeach tangen tspaceTxMasa2-dimensional subspace ofR3.Thismakes: TM!Masmoothsubbund leofthetrivial bundleMR3!M,in thateach berisalinear subspace ofthecorresp onding berofthetrivial bundle.Example 2.4(Thecotangen tbundle ).Associated withthetangen t bundleTM!M,there isa\dual bundle"T M!M,called thecotan- gentbundle:its bersarethevector spaces T xM=Hom R(TM;R); consisting ofreallinear mapsTxM!R,alsoknownasdualvectors.The sections ofTMarethusprecisely thedi eren tial1-forms onM.This isour rstexample ofanimportantvector bundle thatcannot easily be visualized, though onecanstillimagine thatthevector spacesTMvary smoothly insome sense withrespecttox2M. Observ ethatTMhasthesame rankasTM,andindeed there are alwaysisomorphisms TxM=T xMforeachx,butthechoice ofsuchan isomorphism isnotcanonical. Thisisnotatrivial commen t:oncewede ne what \isomorphism" means forvector bundles, itwillturnoutthatTM andTMareoftennotisomorphic asbundles, eventhough theindividual bersTxMandT xMalwaysare. Example 2.5(Tensor bundles ).Thetangen tandcotangen tbundles are bothexamples ofamoregeneral construction, thetensor bundlesTk `M! M,whose sections arethetensor eldsoftype(k;`)onM.Forintegers k0and`0,the ber(Tk `M)xoverx2Misde ned tobethevector space `O j=1T xM! kO j=1TxM! ;20 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES whichconsists ofmultilinear maps TxM:::TxM|{z} `T xM:::T xM|{z} k!R: Thus(Tk `M)xhasdimensionnk+`,and Tk `M!M isarealvectorbundle ofranknk+`.Inparticular, T1 0M=TMhasrankn, andsodoesT0 1M=TM.Fork=`=0,weobtain thetrivial linebundle T0 0M=MR,whose sections aresimply realvalued functions onM.For k0,T0 kMcontainsanimportantsubbundle T0 kMkTM!M ofrankn! k!(nk)!,whose sections arethedi eren tialk-forms onM.1 Notation. Inallthatfollows,wewillmakeoccasional useoftheEinstein summation convention ,whichalready made anappearance intheintroduc- tion,x1.2.Thisisanotational shortcut bywhichasummation isimplied overanyindex thatappearsasapairofupperandlowerindices. Sofor instance iftheindexjrunsfrom1ton, jdxj:=nX j=1jdxj;andXj@ @xj:=nX j=1Xj@ @xj; inthelatter expression, theindex in@xjcountsasa\lower"index by conventionbecause it'sinthedenominator. Thesummation convention andthesigni cance of\upper"vs.\lower"indices isdiscussed more fully inAppendix A. Example 2.6(Distributions ).Supposeisasmooth1-form onthe manifoldMwhichiseverywhere nonzero. Then weclaim thatatevery pointp2M,thekernelofjTpMisan(n1)-dimensional subspacep TpM.Toseethis,choosecoordinates (x1;:::;xn)nearapointp0sothat canbewritten as =jdxj; using thesetofreal-valued \comp onentfunctions"1(p);:::;n(p)de ned nearp0.Byassumption thevector (1(p);:::;n(p))2Rnisneverzero, andthekernelofatpisprecisely thesetoftangen tvectors X=Xj@ @xj2TpM 1Thenotions ofmultilinear maps andtensor products usedherearediscussed in detail inAppendix A. 2.1.VECTOR BUNDLES 21 suchthat(X)=j(p)Xj=0,i.e.itisrepresen tedincoordinates bythe orthogonalcomplement of(1(p);:::;n(p))2Rn,an(n1)-dimensional subspace. Theunion ofthesubspaces kerjTpMforallpde nes asmoothrank- (n1)subbundle !M ofthetangen tbundle, alsoknownasan(n1)-dimensional distribution onM.More generally ,onecande ne smoothm-dimensional distributions foranymn,allofwhicharerank-msubbundles ofTM.Inthiscase, \smoothness" means thatinsome neighborhoodofanypointp2M, onecan ndasetofsmoothvector eldsX1;:::;Xmthatarelinearly independen tandspanqateverypointqclosetop.Asection ofisby de nition avector eldX2Vec(M)suchthatX(p)2pforallp2M. Example 2.7(Acomplex linebundle overS3).Alloftheexamples so farhavebeenrealvector bundles, butonecanjustaswellde ne bundles with bersthatarecomplex vector spaces. Forinstance, de neS3asthe unitsphere inR4,andidentifythelatter withC2viathecorresp ondence (x1;y1;x2;y2) !(x1+iy1;x2+iy2): Then ifh;iC2denotes thestandard complex inner productonC2,one ndsthattherealinner producth;iR4onR4isgivenby hX;YiR4=RehX;YiC2; andinparticularhX;XiR4=hX;XiC2.Thusbythisde nition, S3=fz2C2jhz;ziC2=1g: Thetangen tspaceTzS3isthentherealorthogonal complemen tofthe vectorz2C2=R4withrespecttotheinner producth;iR4.Butthere is alsoacomplex orthogonal complemen t z:=fv2C2jhz;viC2=0g; whichisbothareal2-dimensional subspace ofTzS3andacomplex 1- dimensional subspace ofC2.Theunion ofthese forallz2S3de nes a vector bundle!S3,whichcanbethough tofaseither arealrank-2 subbundle ofTS3!S3orasacomplex rank-1 subbundle ofthetrivial complex bundleS3C2!S3.2 2Thedistribution TS3iswellknownincontactgeometry asthestandar dcontact structur eonS3.22 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES With these examples inmind, weareready forthegeneral de nition. Therigorous discussion willbegininapurely topological context,where thenotion ofcontinuityiswellde ned butsmoothness isnot|smo oth structures onvector bundles willbeintroduced inthenextsection. Notation. Ineverything thatfollows,wechoosea eld F=either RorC; andassume unless otherwise noted thatallvector spaces andlinear maps areF-linear. Inthiswaytherealandcomplex casescanbehandled simul- taneously . De nition 2.8.Avectorbundleofrankmconsists ofapairoftopological spacesEandM,withacontinuoussurjectiv emap:E!Msuchthat foreachx2M,thesubsetEx:=1(x)Eisavectorspace isomorphic toFm,andforeverypointx2Mthere exists anopenneighborhood x2UMandalocaltrivialization :1(U)!UFm: Hereisahomeomorphism whichrestricts toalinear isomorphism Ey! fygFmforeachy2U. WecallEthetotalspaceofthebundle:E!M,andMiscalled thebase.Foreachx2M,thesetEx=1(x)Eiscalled the berover x. De nition 2.9.Avector bundle ofrank1iscalled alinebundle. Abundle ofrankmissometimes alsocalled anm-dimensional vector bundle, oranm-plane bundle.Theuseoftheterm\linebundle" form=1 isquite intuitivewhen F=R;onemustkeepinmind howeverthatinthe complex case,the bersshould bevisualized asplanes rather thanlines. Givenavector bundle:E!MandanysubsetUM,denote EjU=1(U).Asinthede nition above,atrivialization overUisa homeomorphism :EjU!UFm thatrestricts linearly tothe bersasisomorphisms Ex!fxgFm foreachx2U.Onecannot expectsuchatrivialization toexistforevery subsetUM;when itdoesexist, wesaythat:E!Mistrivializable overU.Thuseveryvector bundle isrequired tobelocallytrivializable ,in thesense thattrivializations existoversomeneighborhoodofeachpointin thebase. Thebundle iscalled (globally) trivializable ,orsimply trivial ,if 2.1.VECTOR BUNDLES 23 there exists atrivialization overtheentiretyofM.We'vealready seenthe archetypalexample ofaglobally trivial bundle: theproductE=MFm. Nontrivial bundles areofcourse more interesting, andarealsoinsome sense more common: e.g.thetangen tbundle ofanyclosed surface other thanatorus isnontrivial, though we'renotyetinaposition toprovethis. Example 2.12belowshowsanontrivial linebundle thatisfairly easyto understand.De nition 2.10. Asection ofthebundle:E!Misamaps:M!E suchthats=Id M. Thespace ofcontinuoussections onavector bundle:E!Mis denoted by (E)=fs2C(M;E)js=IdMg: Thisisanin nite dimensional vectorspace, withaddition andscalar mul- tiplication de ned pointwise. Inparticular, everyvectorbundle hasapre- ferred section 02(E),called thezerosection,whichmaps eachpoint x2Mtothezerovector inEx.Thisgivesanatural embeddingM,!E. Remark 2.11.Aswementioned already inExample 2.2,theterm\section" refers tothegeometric interpretation oftheimages(M)asasubset ofthe total spaceE.Onecanalternately de ne acontinuous section ofthe bundle:E!Mtobeanysubset Esuchthatj:!Misa homeomorphism.Example 2.12 (Anontrivial linebundle ).IdentifyS 1withtheunit circle inC,andde ne abundle`!S1tobetheunion ofthesetsfeig `eiS1R2forall2R,where the bers`eiarethe1-dimensional subspaces `ei=Rcos(=2) sin(=2) R2: Ifweconsider thesubset f(ei;v)2`j2R,jvj1g consisting onlyofvectors oflength atmost 1,weobtain aMobius strip. Observ ethatthisbundle doesnotadmit anycontinuoussection thatis nowhere zero.ItfollowsthenfromExercise 2.13belowthat`isnotglobally trivializable. Localtrivializations are,however,easytoconstruct: e.g.for anypointp2S1,de ne :`jS1nfpg!(S1nfpg)R: ei;c cos(=2) sin(=2) 7!(ei;c): Butthistrivialization canneverbeextended continuously tothepointp. (Spendalittletimeconvincing yourself thatthisistrue.)24 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Exercise 2.13. Showthatalinebundle:E!Mistrivial ifandonly ifthere exists acontinuoussections:M!Ethatisnowhere zero. Theexample aboveshowswhyoneoften thinks ofnontrivial vector bundles asbeing\twisted" insome sense|this wordisoften usedinge- ometry andtopology aswellasinphysicstodescrib etheories thatdepend crucially onthenontriviality ofsome bundle. Giventwovector bundlesE!MandF!M,ofrankmand` respectively,alinearbundlemapA:E!Fisanycontinuousmapthat restricts toalinear mapEx!Fxforeachx2M.Abundleisomorphism isahomeomorphism whichisalsoalinear bundle map|in thiscase,the inverseisalinear bundle mapaswell.HenceE!Mistrivializable ifand onlyifitisisomorphic toatrivial bundleMFm!M. There issuchathing asanonline arbundlemapaswell,alsocalled a berpreserving map. Themapf:E!Fiscalled berpreserving iffor allx2M,f(Ex)Fx. De nition 2.14. Let:E!Mbeavectorbundle. Asubbund leofEis asubsetFEsuchthattherestrictionjF:F!Misavector bundle, andtheinclusionF,!Eisacontinuouslinear bundle map. Example 2.15. Thelinebundle ofExample 2.12isasubbundle ofthe trivial 2-plane bundleS1R2!S1. Realvectorbundles canbecharacterized asorientableornon-orien table. Recall thatanorientation forarealm-dimensional vector spaceVisa choice ofanequivalence classofordered bases (v(1);:::;v(m))V; where twosuchbases areequivalentifonecanbedeformed intotheother through acontinuousfamily ofbases. Abasis inthechosen equivalence classiscalled apositively oriente dbasis, while others arecalled negatively oriente d.There arealwaystwochoices oforientation, owingtothefact thatthegeneral linear group GL(m;R)hastwoconnected components, distinguished bythesignofthedeterminan t.3IfVandWareoriented vector spaces, thenanisomorphism A:V!Wiscalled orientation preserving ifitmaps everypositivelyorientedbasis ofVtoapositively orientedbasis ofW;otherwise, itisorientation reversing .Forthespace Rmwithitsnatural orientation givenbythestandard basisofunitvectors (e(1);:::;e(m)),aninvertible matrixA:Rm!Rmisorientation preserving ifandonlyifdetA>0. Thisnotion canbeextended toarealvector bundle:E!M bychoosing orientations oneach berExsothattheorientations \vary continuously withx".More precisely: 3Bycontrast, GL(m;C)isconnected, whichiswhyorientation makesnosense for complex vectorspaces. 2.1.VECTOR BUNDLES 25 De nition 2.16. Anorientation oftherealvectorbundle:E!Misa choiceoforientation forevery berEx,suchthatforanylocaltrivialization :EjU!URm,theinduced isomorphisms Ex!fxgRmforx2U arealleither orientation preserving ororientation reversing. Noteveryrealbundle admits anorientation; those thatdoarecalled orientable . Exercise 2.17. Showthatareallinebundle isorientable ifandonlyifit istrivializable. Inparticular, thebundle ofExample 2.12isnotorientable. AsmoothmanifoldMiscalled orientable ifitstangen tbundle isori- entable. Thisisequivalenttoamore general notion oforientation which isalsode ned fortopologicalmanifolds, evenwithout awellde ned tan- gentbundle. Themore general de nition isframed interms ofhomology theory; seeforexample [Hat02 ]. Example 2.18. Using again thenontrivial linebundle`!S1ofExam- ple2.12,let =f(ei;v)2`jjvj1g: Thisisawellknownmanifold withboundary: theMobiusstrip.Tosee thatitisnon-orien table, imagine placing yourthumbandindex nger onthesurface toform anorientedbasis ofthetangen tspace atsome point:assume thethumbisthe rstbasis vector andtheindex nger is thesecond. Nowimagine movingyourhand oncearound, deforming the basiscontinuously asitgoes.When itcomes backtothesame point,you willhaveabasis thatcannot bedeformed backtotheoriginal one|y ou wouldhavetorotate yourhandtorecoveritsoriginal position, pointingin directions nottangen ttoalong theway. Other popular examples ofnon-orien tablesurfaces include theprojective plane andtheKlein bottle,cf.[Spi99]. De nition 2.19. Let:E!Mbeavector bundle ofrankm,and chooseasubsetUMofthebase. Aframe (v(1);:::;v(m)) overUisanordered setofcontinuoussectionsv(j)2(EjU),suchthatfor everyx2Utheset(v(1)(x);:::;v(m)(x))forms abasisofEx. Aglobalframeisaframe overtheentirebaseM;asthenextstatemen t shows,thiscanonlyexistifthebundle istrivializable. Proposition 2.20. Aframe(v(1);:::;v(m))overUMforthebundle :E!Mdetermines atrivialization :EjU!UFm suchthatforeachx2Uandj2f1;:::;mg,(v(j)(x))=(x;e(j)),where (e(1);:::;e(m))isthestandar dbasisofunitvectorsinFm.26 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Proof.Onesimply de nes (v(j)(x))=(x;e(j))andextends totherestof the berExbylinearit y:thususing thesummation conventiontoexpress arbitrary vectorsX=Xjv(j)2Exinterms ofcomponentsXj2F, (X)=(x;Xje(j))=0B@x;0B@X 1 ... Xm1CA1CA: Theresulting maponEj Uisclearly continuous. Obvious asthisresult seems, it'suseful forconstructing andforvisual- izingtrivializations, sinceframes areinsome waysmore intuitiveobjects. 2.2Smoothness Sofarthisisallpurely topological. Tobring things intotherealm of di eren tialgeometry ,some notion of\di eren tiabilit y"isneeded. Tode ne this,wenote rstthateveryvector bundle admits asystem oflocaltrivializations ,i.e.asetoftrivializations  :EjU !U Fmsuch thattheopensetsfU gcoverM.Suchasystem de nes asetofcontinuous transition maps g :U \U !GL(m;F); sothateachofthemaps  1 :(U \U )Fm!(U \U )Fmtakes theform (x;v)7!(x;g (x)v): Exercise 2.21. Showthatarealvectorbundle:E!Misorientableif andonlyifitadmits asystem oflocaltrivializations forwhichthetransition mapsg :U \U !GL(m;R)allsatisfy detg (x)>0. De nition 2.22. SupposeMisasmoothmanifold and:E!Misa vector bundle. Asmoothstructur eon:E!Misamaximal system oflocaltrivializations whicharesmoothlycompatible,meaning thatall transition mapsg :U \U !GL(m;F)aresmooth. Thebundle:E!Mtogether withasmoothstructure iscalled a smoothvectorbundle. Thesmoothness ofthetransition mapsg :U \U !GL(m;F)is judged bychoosing localcoordinates onMandtreating GL(m;F)asan opensubset ofthevector space ofF-linear transformations onFm. Remark 2.23.Onecanalsode ne vectorbundles ofclassCk,byrequiring thetransition maps tobek-times di eren tiable. Forthistomakesense whenk1,thebaseMmustalsohavethestructure ofaCk-manifold, orbetter. Bythisde nition, allvector bundles arebundles ofclassC0 2.2.SMOOTHNESS 27 (Mneednotevenbeamanifold whenk=0,onlyatopological space). Almost allstatemen tsbelowthatusetheword\smooth"canbeadapted toassume only nitely manyderivatives. Proposition 2.24. If:E!Misasmoothvectorbundleofrankm anddimM=n,thenthetotalspaceEadmits anaturalsmoothmanifold structur esuchthatisasmoothmap. Thedimension ofEisn+mif F=R,orn+2mifF=C. Exercise 2.25. ProveProposition 2.24.Hint: forx2U andv2Ex,use thetrivialization  andacoordinate chartforsome openneighborhood x2UU tode ne acoordinate chartfortheopenneighborhoodv2 EjUE. Thetrivial bundleMRm!Mobviously hasanatural smooth structure ifMisasmoothmanifold. Wecanconstruct asmoothstructure forthetangen tbundleTM!Masfollows.PickanopencoveringM=S U andacollection ofsmoothcharts' :U ! Rn.Then de ne localtrivializations  :TMjU !U Rnby  (X)=(x;d' (x)X); forx2U andX2TxM.Since' '1 isalwaysasmoothdi eomorphism betweenopensubsets ofRn,thetransition maps g (x)=d(' '1 )(' (x))2GL(n;R) aresmooth. Exercise 2.26. Verifythatthetensor bundles anddistributions fromEx- amples 2.5,2.6and2.7areallsmoothvector bundles. Inthecontextofsmoothvectorbundles, itmakessense torequire that allsections andbundle maps besmooth.Wethusrede ne (E)asthe vector space ofallsmoothsections , (E)=fs2C1(M;E)js=IdMg: Notethatthisde nition requires thesmoothmanifold structure ofthetotal spaceE,using Proposition 2.24.Thefollowingexercise demonstrates an alternativ ede nition whichisalsoquite revealing, andmakesnoreference tothetotalspace. Exercise 2.27. Showthatthefollowing notion ofasmoothsection is equivalenttothede nition givenabove:asmoothsection isamaps: M!Esuchthatforeverysmoothlocaltrivialization :EjU!UFm, themapsjU:U!UFmtakestheform s(x)=(x;f(x)) forsome smoothmapf:U!Fm.28 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Forbundles ofclassCkwithk1,itmakessense tospeakalsoof Cr-sections foranyrk;these canbede ned analogously tosmooth sections, byeither ofthetwoapproac hesoutlined above.Thespace of sections ofclassCrisdenoted byCr(E). Similar remarks apply tolinear bundle maps betweendi eren tiable vector bundlesE!MandF!Mofrankmand`respectively.In particular, asmoothbundle mapA:E!Fcanbeexpressed inlocal trivializations asamapoftheform (x;v)7!(x;B(x)v) forsome smoothfunctionB(x)withvalues inHom( Fm;F`). Proposition 2.20cannowbeammended tosaythatanysmoothframe (v(1);:::;v(m))overanopensubset orsubmanifoldUMdetermines a smoothtrivialization overU. Wealsohaveanaddendum toDe nition 2.14:asubbundleFEis called asmoothsubbund leifjF:F!Madmits asmoothstructure such thattheinclusionF,!Eisasmoothlinear bundle map. Exercise 2.28. IfTMisasmoothdistribution onthemanifoldM, showthat!Misasmoothsubbundle ofTM!M. Exercise 2.29. IfMisasmoothsubmanifold ofRN,showthatTM!M isasmoothsubbundle ofthetrivial bundleMRN!M. Manyofthestatemen tsthatfollowcanbeapplied inobvious waysto either general vectorbundles orsmoothvectorbundles. Since wewillneed toassume smoothness when connections areintroduced inChapter 3,the reader mayaswellassume forsimplicit ythatfromnowonallbundles, sections andbundle maps aresmooth|with theunderstanding thatthis assumption isnotalwaysnecessary . 2.3Operations onvector bundles There aremanywaysinwhichoneortwovectorbundles canbecombined orenhanced tocreate anewbundle. Wenowoutline themostimportant examples; inallcasesitisastraigh tforwardexercise toverifythatthenew objectsadmit (continuousorsmooth)vector bundle structures. Bundles oflinear maps Fortwovector spacesVandW,denote by Hom(V;W) 2.3.OPERA TIONS ONVECTOR BUNDLES 29 thevector space oflinear mapsV!W.Thisnotation assumes thatboth spaces arede ned overthesame eldF,inwhichcaseHom(V;W)isalso anF-linear vectorspace. Ifoneorbothspaces arecomplex, onecanalways stillde ne aspace ofreallinearmaps Hom R(V;W) byregarding anycomplex space asarealspace oftwicethedimension. NotethatHom R(V;W)isactually acomplex vectorspace ifWiscomplex, sincethescalar multiplication (A)(v)=A(v) thenmakessense for2C,A2Hom R(V;W)andv2V.IfVandWare bothcomplex spaces, wecandistinguish Hom(V;W)fromHom R(V;W) byusing Hom C(V;W)todenote the(complex) space ofcomplex linear maps. Thisnotation willbeusedwhenev erthere ispotentialconfusion. If V=W,weusethenotation End(V)=Hom(V;V); withobvious de nitions forEnd R(V)andEnd C(V)whenVisacomplex vector space. Nowfortwovector bundlesE!MandF!Moverthesame base, wede ne thebundleoflinearmaps Hom(E;F)!M; whose bersareHom(E;F)x=Hom(Ex;Fx).Thishasanatural smooth bundle structure ifbothE!MandF!Maresmooth.Thesections A2(Hom(E;F))areprecisely thesmoothlinear bundle mapsA:E! F.Wesimilarly denote by End(E)!M thebundle oflinear maps fromEtoitself. Thebundles Hom F(E;F)!M andEnd F(E)forF=RorChavenatural de nitions, relating tothe discussion above. WhenVandWarebothcomplex vectorspaces, wecanregard Hom C(V;W) asacomplex subspace ofHom R(V;W);indeed, Hom C(V;W)=fA2Hom R(V;W)jA(iv)=iA(v)forallv2Vg: Another interesting subspace isthespace ofcomplex antiline armaps Hom C(V;W)=fA2Hom R(V;W)jA(iv)=iA(v)forallv2Vg: Thusforcomplex vector bundlesE!MandF!M,wecande ne bundles ofcomplex antilinear mapsE!FandE!Erespectively: Hom C(E;F)!M and End C(E)!M: These aresubbundles ofHom R(E;F)!MandEnd R(E)!Mrespec- tively.30 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Thedualbundle ThedualspaceVofavector spaceVisHom(V;F),anditselemen tsare called dualvectors.Theextension ofthisconcept tobundles isaspecial caseofthede nition above:wechooseFtobethetrivial linebundle MF!M,andde ne thedualbundleofE!Mby E=Hom(E;MF)!M: Foreachx2M,the berE x=Hom(Ex;F)isthedualspace ofEx. Forexample, thedualofatangen tbundleTM!Misthecotangent bundleTM!M,whose sections arethe1-forms onM. Direct sums Thedirectsumofapairofvector spacesVandWisthevector space VW=f(v;w)jv2V;w2Wg withaddition de ned by(v;w)+(v0;w0)=(v+v0;w+w0)andscalar multiplication c(v;w)=(cv;cw).Ofcourse, asaset(andasagroup under addition),VWisthesame thing asVW.Thereason forthe redundan tnotation isthatVWgivesrisetoanatural operation ontwo vectorbundlesE!MandF!M,producing anewbundle overMthat really isnottheCartesian productEF.Thedirect sumbundle EF!M isde ned tohave bers(EF)x=ExFxforx2M. Exercise 2.30. Fortwocomplex vector bundlesE!MandF!M, showthatHom R(E;F)=Hom C(E;F)Hom C(E;F). It'ssurprisingly complicated tovisualize thetotalspace ofEF:no- tably,it'scertainly notEF.Thelatter consists ofallpairs(v;w)such thatv2Exandw2Fyforanyx;y2M,whereas (v;w)2EFonlyif x=y,i.e.vandwarein bersoverthesamepointofthebase. Onecande ne abundle whose totalspace isEF;infact,forthiswe nolonger needassume thatEandFhavethesame base. GivenE!M andF!N,onecande ne aCartesian productbundleEF!MN with bers(EF)(x;y)=ExFy.Forourpurposeshowever,thisoperation islessinteresting thanthedirect sum. 2.3.OPERA TIONS ONVECTOR BUNDLES 31 Tensor products Forvector spacesVandWofdimensionmandnrespectively,thetensor productV Wisavectorspace ofdimensionmn.There arevarious ways tode ne this,details ofwhichweleavetoAppendix A.Fornowletus simply recall themostimportantexample ofatensor productthatarises indi eren tialgeometry: Vk `= `O i=1V! kO j=1V! isthenk+`-dimensional vector space ofallmultilinear maps V:::V|{z} `V:::V |{z} k!F: Tensor products extend tobundles intheobvious way:givenE!M andF!M,theirtensor productisthebundle E F!M whose bersare(E F)x=Ex Fx.There ispotentialconfusion hereif bothbundles arecomplex, sowesometimes distinguish thebundles E RF!M andE CF!M: Theformer has bersthataretensor products ofExandFx,treating both asrealvector spaces. Exercise 2.31. IfVandWarecomplex vectorspaces ofdimensionpand qrespectively,showthatdim C(V CW)=pq,while dim R(V RW)=4pq. Thusthese twospaces cannot beidenti ed withoneanother. Havingde ned dualbundles andtensor products, theideaofthetensor bundlesTk `Monamanifold canbeextended toarbitrary vector bundles byde ning Ek `= `O i=1E! kO j=1E! : The ber(Ek `)xforx2Misthenthevectorspace ofallmultilinear maps Ex:::Ex|{z} `E x:::E x|{z} k!F: Alittlemultilinear algebra (seeAppendix A)showsthatthereisacanonical bundle isomorphism Ek `=Hom `i=1E; kj=1E ;32 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES inparticular, E1 0=E,E0 1=EandE1 1=End(E). Thetensor productbundleE0 k= kj=1Ehasanimportantsubbundle kE!M; whose berskE xarespaces ofalternating k-forms onEx.Onecansimi- larlyde ne analternating tensor productkEEk 0,consisting ofalternat- ingk-forms onE.Asomewhat more abstract (butalsomathematically cleaner) de nition ofkEisgiveninAppendix A. Exercise 2.32. Showthatarealvector bundleE!Mofrankmis orientable ifandonlyifthelinebundle mE!Mistrivializable. And thatthisisequivalenttothelinebundle mE!Mbeingtrivializable. Complexi cation Justasanycomplex vector bundle canbetreated asarealbundle with twicetherank, anyrealbundle determines arelated complex bundle ofthe same rank. Foranindividual realvector spaceV,thecomplexi c ation is de ned as VC=V RC; where Cisregarded asa2-dimensional realvector space. Thetensor productisarealvector space withtwicethedimension ofV;indeed, any 2VCcanbewritten asasum =(v1 1)+(v2 i) forsome unique pairofvectorsv1;v22V.More importantly,VCcanbe regarded asacomplex vector space byde ning scalar multiplication c(v z):=v (cz) forc2C.Then dim CVC=dim RV,andanyrealbasisofVbecomes also acomplex basisofVC. Thesametrickcanbeuseddocomplexify arealvectorbundleE!M, setting EC=E R(MC); whereMC!Misthetrivial complex linebundle, treated asareal vector bundle ofrank2. Pullbac kbundles Suppose:E!Misasmoothvector bundle andf:N!Misa smoothmap, withNasmoothmanifold. Thebundle onMcanthenbe \pulled back"viaftoasmoothvector bundle f:fE!N; 2.4.VECTOR BUNDLES WITH STRUCTURE 33 with bers (fE)x=Ef(x): Thisisoften called aninducedbundle. Exercise 2.33. VerifythatfE!Nadmits asmoothvector bundle structure ifthemapf:N!Missmooth. Exercise 2.34. ForasmoothmanifoldM,de ne thediagonal map: M!MM:x7!(x;x).Showthatthere isanatural isomorphism T(MM)=TMTM. Example 2.35(Vector elds along amap).Pullbac kbundles appear naturally inmanysituations, e.g.inExercise 2.34.Foranother example, consider asmooth1-parameter family ofsmoothmaps ft:N!M fort2(1;1).Di eren tiating withrespecttotatt=0givesasmooth map:N!TM, (x)=@ @tft(x) t=0: Clearly(x)2Tf0(x)M,thusisasection ofthepullbac kbundlef 0TM! N.Suchasection isalsoknownasavector eldalongf0. 2.4Vector bundles withextra structure Inthissection wesurveyvarious typesofstructure thatcanbeadded toa vectorbundle, suchasmetrics, volume elemen tsandsymplectic forms. The general pattern isthateachadditional structure allowsustorestrict our attentiontoasystem oftransition maps thattakevalues insome proper subgroupofthegeneral linear group. Thisobserv ation willbeimportant when werelate these structures toprincipal bundles inSection 2.8. 2.4.1 Complex structures Ashasbeenmentioned already ,acomplex vector bundle canalwaysbe though tofasarealbundle withoneadditional pieceofstructure, namely , ade nition of\scalar multiplication byi".Toformalize this,consider rstarealvector spaceV,withdimV=2m.Acomplex structur eon Visalinear mapJ2End(V)suchthatJ2= ,where denotes the identitytransformation onV.NotethatnosuchJcanexistifVhasodd dimension. (Proveit!)Butthere aremanysuchstructures onR2m,for example thematrix J0= 0 m m0 ;34 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES where mdenotes them-by-midentitymatrix. WecallJ0thestandar d complex structure onR2m,forthefollowingreason: ifR2misidenti ed withCmviathecorresp ondence (x1;:::;xm;y1;:::;ym) !(x1+iy1;:::;xm+iym); thenmultiplication byionCmisequivalenttomultiplication ontheleft byJ0inR2m. Inthesamemanner, achoice ofcomplex structureJonthespaceVof dimension 2mgivesVthestructure ofanm-dimensional complex vector space, withscalar multiplication de ned by (a+ib)v:=(a +bJ)v: Exercise 2.36. Showthateverycomplex structureJonR2missimilar tothestandard structureJ0,i.e.there existsS2GL(2m;R)suchthat SJS1=J0.Hint: construct abasis(v1;:::;vm;w1;:::;wm)ofR2mwith wk=Jvkforeachk. Consider nowarealvector bundleE!Mofrank2m.Acomplex structur eonE!Misde ned tobeanysmoothsectionJ:M!End(E) suchthatforallx2M,[J(x)]2=IdEx.Thisde nes each berExasa complex vector space ofdimensionm. Proposition 2.37. TherealbundleE!Mwithcomplex structur eJ admits thestructur eofasmoothcomplex vectorbundleofrankm. Proof.Itsuces ifforeveryx2M,wecan ndaneighborhoodx2U Mandasmoothtrivialization :EjU!UCmwhichiscomplex linear oneach ber,i.e.fory2Uandv2Ey, (Jv)=i(v): Thiscanbedonebyconstructing asmoothfamily ofcomplex bases forthe bersinaneighborhoodofx,thenapplying Proposition 2.20.Weleave therestasanexercise|the ideaisessentially tosolveExercise 2.36,not justforasingle matrixJbutforasmoothfamily ofthem. Thisresult canberephrased asfollows:since:E!Misasmooth realvectorbundle, thereisalready amaximal system oflocaltrivializations  :EjU !U R2mwithsmoothtransition maps g :U \U !GL(2m;R): Identifying CmwithR2msuchthati=J0,wecanidentifyGL(m;C)with thesubgroup GL(m;C)=fA2GL(2m;R)jAJ0=J0Ag: (2.1) Then Proposition 2.37saysthatafterthrowing outenough ofthetriv- ializations inthesystemfU ; g,weobtain asystem whichstillcov- ersMandsuchthatalltransition maps takevalues inthesubgroup GL(m;C)GL(2m;R). 2.4.VECTOR BUNDLES WITH STRUCTURE 35 2.4.2 Bundle metrics Ametric onavectorbundle isachoice ofsmoothly varying inner products onthe bers.Tobemoreprecise, if:E!Misasmoothvectorbundle, thenabundle metric isasmoothmap h;i:EE!F suchthattherestriction toeach berExExde nes a(realorcomplex) inner productonEx.Intherealcase,h;ijExExistherefore abilinear formwhichissymmetric andpositivede nite. Thisiscalled aEuclide an structur e,making thepair(E;h;i)intoaEuclide anvectorbundle. Inthecomplex case,theformh;ijExExispositivede nite andsesquilin- ear,whichmeans thatforallv;w2Exandc2C, (i)hv;wi=hw;vi, (ii)hcv;wi=chv;wiandhv;cwi=chv;wi, (iii)hv1+v2;wi=hv1;wi+hv2;wiandhv;w1+w2i=hv;w1i+hv;w2i, (iv)hv;vi>0ifv6=0. Themetrich;iisthencalled aHermitian structur e,and(E;h;i)isa Hermitian vectorbundle. Proposition 2.38. Every smoothvectorbundle:E!Madmits a bundlemetric. Weleavetheproofasanexercise|the keyisthatsince metrics are positivede nite, anysumofmetrics de nes another metric. Thuswecan de ne metrics inlocaltrivializations andaddthem together viaapartition ofunity.Thisisastandard argumen tinRiemannian geometry ,see[Spi99] fordetails. Example 2.39(Riemannian manifolds ).Themostimportantapplica- tionofbundle metrics istothetangen tbundleTM!Moverasmooth manifold. Ametric onTMisusually denoted byasmoothsymmetric tensor eldg2(T0 2M),andthepair(M;g)iscalled aRiemannian manifold .Themetricgdetermines anotion oflength forsmoothpaths :[t0;t1]!Mbysetting length ( )=Zt1 t0j_ (t)jgdt; where byde nition,jXjg=p g(X;X).Thestudy ofsmoothmanifolds withmetrics andtheirgeometric implications fallsunder theheading of Riemannian geometry .Itisaverylargesubject|w e'lltouchuponafewof thefundamen talprinciples inourlaterstudy ofconnections andcurvature.36 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Example 2.40(Quantumwavefunctions ).Anexample ofaHermi- tianvector bundle comes fromquantummechanics, where theprobabilit y distribution ofasingle particle (without spin) inthree-dimensional space canbemodeled byawavefunction :R3!C: Theprobabilit yof nding theparticle within aregionUR3isgivenby PU( )=Z Uh (x); (x)idx; wherehv;wi:=vwde nes thestandard inner productonC.Though onewouldn't phrase things thiswayinanintroductory classonquantum mechanics, onecanthink of asasection ofthetrivial Hermitian line bundle (R3C;h;i).Thisisnotmerely something amathematician would saytointimidate aphysicist|in quantum eldtheory itbecomes quite importanttoconsider elds assections of(possibly nontrivial) Hermitian vector bundles. Where general vector bundles areconcerned, themostimportantthe- oretical result aboutbundle metrics isthefollowing. Recall thatfortwo inner productspaces (V;h;i1)and(W;h;i2),anisometryA:V!Wis anisomorphism suchthat hAv;Awi2=hv;wi1 forallv;w2V. Proposition 2.41. Let:E!Mbeavectorbundlewithametrich;i. Thenforeveryx2M,thereisanopenneighb orhoodx2UManda trivialization :EjU!UFm suchthattheresulting linearmapsEx!fxgFmareallisometries (with respecttoh;iandthestandar dinnerproductonFm). Proof.Using Proposition 2.20,itsuces toconstruct aframe (v1;:::;vm) onsome neighborhoodofxsothattheresulting bases oneach berare orthonormal. Onecandothisbystarting fromanarbitrary frame and applying theGram-Sc hmidt orthogonalization process. Atrivialization thatde nes isometries onthe bersiscalled anor- thogonal trivialization, orunitary inthecomplex case. Asaresult of Proposition 2.41,wecanassume without lossofgeneralit ythatasys- temoflocaltrivializationsfU ; gforaEuclidean vector bundle con- sistsonlyoforthogonal trivializations, inwhichcasethetransition maps g :U \U !GL(m;R)actually takevalues intheorthogonal group O(m)=fA2GL(m;R)jATA= g: 2.4.VECTOR BUNDLES WITH STRUCTURE 37 ForaHermitian vectorbundle, instead ofO(m)wehavetheunitary group U(m)=fA2GL(m;C)jAyA= g; where byde nitionAyisthecomplex conjugate ofAT.Taking thisdis- cussion astepfurther, wecould formulate analternativ ede nition ofa Euclidean orHermitian structure onavectorbundle asamaximal system oflocaltrivializations suchthatalltransition maps takevaluesinthesub- groups O(m)GL(m;R)orU(m)GL(m;C).It'seasytoseethatsuch asystem alwaysde nes aunique bundle metric. These remarks willbeof fundamen talimportance laterwhen westudy structure groups. 2.4.3 Volume forms andvolume elemen ts OnanyrealvectorspaceVofdimensionm,avolume formcanbede ned asanonzero elemen toftheone-dimensional vector space mV,called the \top-dimensional exterior product". Forexample, Rmhasanatural volume form =e(1)^:::^e(m); where (e(1);:::;e(m))isthestandard basisofunitvectors inRm.Achoiceof volume form2mVdetermines anotion of\signed volume" forsubsets ofVasfollows:givenanyorderedm-tuple ofvectors (v1;:::;vm),wede ne theorientedparallelopip edspanned bythesevectors tohavesigned volume Vol(v1;:::;vm)2R,where v1^:::^vm=Vol(v1;:::;vm): Herewe'reusing thefactthatdimmV=1and6=0todeduce that there alwaysissuchanumber.Ifyou'renotusedtothinking aboutwedge products ofvectors butarefamiliar withdi eren tialforms, thenyoucan think ofvolume forms alternativ elyasfollows:mVisalso1-dimensional, thusthechoice2mVde nes aunique alternating m-form!2mV suchthat !(v1;:::;vm)=Vol(v1;:::;vm): Avolume formistherefore equivalenttoachoice ofanonzero alternating m-form!onV,andalmost allstatemen tsinthefollowingabout2mV canberephrased asstatemen tsabout!2mV. Exercise 2.42. (a)Showthatif:E!Misany(realorcomplex) linebundle, thena choice ofsmoothnowhere zerosections2(E)determines abundle isomorphism E=Einanatural way.38 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES (b)Showthatforanyvector bundle:E!Mofrankmandany integerkm,there isacanonical bundle isomorphism k(E)= (kE). (c)Conclude, asinthediscussion above,thatachoiceofvolume formfor arealbundle:E!Mofrankmde nes naturally anisomorphism mE=m(E),andthusacorresp onding volume formforthedual bundleE!M. Youshould takeamomen ttoconvince yourself thatthisde nes some- thing consisten twiththeintuitivenotion ofvolume: inparticular, multi- plying anyofthevectorsvjbyapositivenumberchanges thevolume by thesamefactor, andanylinear dependence among thevectors (v1;:::;vm) produces a\degenerate" parallelopip ed,withzerovolume. Thestandard volume formonRmisde ned sothattheunitcubehasvolume one.Some- what lessintuitivelyperhaps, Vol(v1;:::;vm)isnotalwayspositive:it changes signifwereversetheorder ofanytwovectors, sincethischanges theorientation oftheparallelopip ed.Thusonemustgenerally takethe absolute valuejVol(v1;:::;vm)jto ndthegeometric volume. These remarks extend easily toacomplex vectorspace ofdimensionm, though inthiscasevolume canbeacomplex number|w ewillforego any attempt tointerpret thisgeometrically .Ineither therealorcomplex case, alinear isomorphism A:(V;1)!(W;2) betweenm-dimensional vector spaces withvolume forms issaidtobevol- umepreserving ifeveryparallelopip edPVhasthesame (signed or complex) volume asA(P)W.Forexample, amatrixA2GL(m;F)is volume preserving withrespecttothenatural volume formonFmifand onlyifdetA=1. Exercise 2.43. Alinear mapA:V!Wde nes acorresp onding linear map A:mV!mW; sendingv1^:::^vmtoAv1^:::^Avm,aswellasapullbac k A:mW!mV; suchthatA!(v1;:::;vm)=!(Av1;:::;Avm).ShowthatA:(V;1)! (W;2)isvolume preserving ifandonlyifA1=2.Equiv alently,de n- ingvolume viam-forms!12mVand!22mW,Aisvolume preserv- ingifandonlyifA!2=!1. Foranyvector bundle:E!Mofrankm,thetop-dimensional exterior bundles mE!MandmE!Marelinebundles. Inthe 2.4.VECTOR BUNDLES WITH STRUCTURE 39 realcase,wesawinExercise 2.32thatthese linebundles aretrivial ifand onlyifE!Misorientable, inwhichcasethere existsmoothsections :M!mEand!:M!mEthatarenowher ezero.Sucha section isveryfarfromunique, since wecanalwaysobtain another via multiplication withasmoothpositivefunctionf:M!(0;1). Weshallcallanowhere zerosection2(mE)or!2(mE)a volume formonE,because itde nes asmoothly varying notion ofsigned volume Vol(;:::;)oneach ber.Thisshould bemostly familiar from thespecialcasewhereEisthetangen tbundle ofasmoothn-manifold M;thenavolume formisde ned tobeanowhere zerodi eren tialn-form (cf.[Spi65]),i.e.asection ofnTM. Eventhough orientation doesn'tmakesense inthecomplex case,the aboveremarks canstillbeextended almost verbatim toacomplex bundle :E!MofrankmifmEistrivial. Avolume formisagain de ned asa smoothnowhere zerosection2(mE),anditnowde nes a\complex volume" Vol(v1;:::;vm)foranyorderedm-tuple ofvectors inthesame ber. Proposition 2.44. Let:E!Mbeavectorbundleofrankmwith avolume form2(mE).Then foreveryx2M,thereisanopen neighb orhoodx2UMandatrivialization :EjU!UFm suchthattheresulting linearmapsEx!fxgFmareallvolume preserv- ing.Exercise 2.45. ProveProposition 2.44.Hint: givenanyframe (v1;:::;vm) overasubsetUM,onecanmultiplyv1byasmoothfunction suchthat Vol(v1;:::;vm)1. Inparticular, amaximal system oflocaltrivializationsfU ; gcan bereduced toasystem ofvolume preserving trivializations, forwhichall transition maps takevalues inthespeciallineargroup SL(m;F)=fA2GL(m;F)jdetA=1g: AEuclidean structureh;ionanorientedrealbundle:E!M determines aunique preferred volume formsuchthattheorientedcube spanned byanypositivelyorientedorthonormal basisofExhasvolume one. Thatthisiswellde ned followsfromExercise 2.46below.Noworientation preserving orthogonal transformations arealsovolume preserving, sowe cancombinePropositions 2.41and2.44toassume thatalltransition maps takevalues inthespecialorthogonalgroup SO(m)=O(m)\SL(m;R):40 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES NotethatSO(m)canalternativ elybede ned asthesubgroup SO(m)=fA2O(m)jdetA=1g: Thisisequivalenttothefactthateverytransformation ofRmthatpreserv es boththeinner productandtheorientation alsopreserv essigned volume, i.e.ametric andorientation together determine apreferred volume form. Exercise 2.46. Consider Fmwithitsstandard inner product, anddenote thestandard unitbasisvectors bye(1);:::;e(m). (a)Showthatif(v(1);:::;v(m))isanyother ordered basisofFmthen v(1)^:::^v(m)=det(V)(e(1)^:::^e(m)) whereV2GL(m;F)isthematrix whosejthcolumn isv(j)2Fm. Hint: sincemFmis1-dimensional, theexpression (v(1);:::;v(m))7!v(1)^:::^v(m) e(1)^:::^e(m) de nes anantisymmetric m-linear formonFm.Howmanysuchforms arethere? (b)IfF=RandwegiveRmthestandard orientation, showthatfor everypositivelyorientedorthonormal basis(v(1);:::;v(m)), v(1)^:::^v(m)=e(1)^:::^e(m): (c)Conclude thateverym-dimensional realvector space withanori- entation andaninner productadmits avolume formforwhichall positivelyorientedunitcubeshavesigned volume one. Thesituation foracomplex bundle:E!MwithHermitian struc- tureh;iisslightlydi eren t.Nowavolume form2(mE)canbecalled compatible withh;iifevery berhasanorthonormal basiswithvolume one.Notice howeverthatifVol(v1;:::;vm)=1,then(eiv1;v2;:::;vm)is another orthonormal basis andVol(eiv1;v2;:::;vm)=ei,sowecannot require thatallorthonormal bases havevolume one.Relatedly ,there isno wellde ned notion of\orien tation" thatcould helpuschooseacompatible volume formuniquely; givenanycompatible form,another suchformis de ned byfiff:M!Cisanysmoothfunction withjfj=1. Givenh;iandacompatible volume form,aneasyvariation on Proposition 2.44showsthatwecanassume alltransition maps takevalues inthespecialunitary group SU(m)=U(m)\SL(m;C): 2.4.VECTOR BUNDLES WITH STRUCTURE 41 Thenonuniqueness ofthevolume formisrelated tothefactthatSU(m) isasubmanifold ofonedimension lessinU(m);bycontrast, SO(m)and O(m)havethesame dimension, theformer beingaconnected component ofthelatter. Anon-orien table realbundle:E!Mofrankmdoesnotadmit anyvolume form, butonecanstillde ne asmoothly varying unsigned volume onthe bers.Thisismost easily seeninthecasewhere there is abundle metrich;i:thenitisnatural tosaythatallorthonormal bases spannon-orien tedcubesofvolume one,andde ne apositive volume for allother bases andparallelopip edsaccordingly .Theresulting structure iscalled avolume element onthebundle:E!M.Inparticular, everyRiemannian manifold (M;g),orientableornot,hasanatural volume elemen tonitstangen tbundle, whichonecanusetode ne integration of real-valued functions onM. More generally ,onecande ne avolume element onanyrealbundle :E!Mofrankmtobeachoice oftwononzero volume formsx2 mExoneach berEx,whichvarysmoothly inthefollowingsense: every x02Miscontained inanopenneighborhoodUMwhichadmits a smoothvolume formU:U!mEsuchthat x=U(x) forallx2U.Theexistence ofvolume elemen tsingeneral followsfromthe existence ofbundle metrics, withalittlehelpfromExercise 2.46.Then thevolume ofparallelopip edsisde ned by v1^:::^vm=Vol(v1;:::;vm)(x) foranyunordered basisfv1;:::;vmgofEx,withtheplusorminussign chosen sothatvolume ispositive. Exercise 2.47. Showthateveryrealbundle withavolume elemen tadmits asystem oflocaltrivializations suchthatthetransition maps takevalues inthegroup fA2GL(m;R)jdetA=1g: Example 2.48(Volume elemen tsincoordinates ).It'suseful tohave explicit coordinate expressions forvolume elemen tsonRiemannian mani- folds, particularly ifonewantstounderstand thephysicsliterature, where coordinates areusedinpreference togeometrically invariantobjects.4We beginby nding anexpression forthevolume formonageneral realbundle ofrankmwithmetrich;i,withrespecttoalocalframe (e(1);:::;e(m)) 4Forinstance, physicists tendtode ne atensor purely interms ofitscoordinate expression, stipulating thatitmust\transform properly" withrespecttocoordinate changes.42 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES onsome opensetUM.Since thequestion ispurely local,weloseno generalit yinassuming thatEjU!Uisanorientedbundle. Theframe (e(1);:::;e(m))isthenassumed tobepositivelyoriented,butisotherwise arbitrary; inparticular, wedonotrequire ittobeorthonormal. Themetric nowde nes arealm-by-msymmetric matrixGwithentries Gij=he(i);e(j)i; andusing theframe toexpress vectorsv=vie(i)2Exforx2U,wehave hv;wi=Gijviwj: Nowchooseanorthonormal frame (^e(1);:::;^e(m));thecorresp onding ma- trixbGisthentheidentity,withbGij=ij.Wecanusethisnewframe to identifyEjU!Uwiththetrivial Euclidean vector bundleURm!U, thusconsidering theother frame (e(1);:::;e(m))toconsist ofsmoothRm- valued functions onU.Thevectors (^e(1);:::;^e(m))arenowsimply the standard unitbasisvectors ofRm.ByExercise 2.46,wehave e(1)^:::^e(m)=det(V)^e(1)^:::^^e(m)=det(V) (2.2) whereisthenatural volume formdetermined bythemetric andorienta- tion,andVisthematrix whose columns arethevectorse(1);:::;e(m)2Rm. Wecanrelate thematricesVandGasfollows.Computing intheorthonor- malcoordinates, Gij=he(i);e(j)i=bGk`Vk iV` j=(VT)k ik`V` i=(VT V)ij=(VTV)ij; thusG=VTV,anddetG=(detV)2.Combining thiswith(2.2)givesa formulaforthevolume forminterms ofthemetric andtheframe, =1p detGe(1)^:::^e(m): (2.3) Thisassumes there isanorientation and(e(1);:::;e(m))ispositivelyori- ented,butitclearly applies tothenon-orien tedcaseaswellifweinsert signsintheappropriate places. Letusapply thisformulatothecaseofaRiemannian manifold (M;g) withcoordinates (x1;:::;xn)onsome neighborhoodUM.Thecoordi- nates determine aframing (@1;:::;@n)ofTMoverU,andoneexpresses themetric inthese coordinates bythen-by-nsymmetric matrix gij=g(@i;@j); sothatiftangen tvectors arewrittenX=Xi@i,theng(X;Y)=gijXiYj. Avolume elemen ton(M;g)isactually avolume elemen tonthecotangent 2.4.VECTOR BUNDLES WITH STRUCTURE 43 bundleTM,andwewanttoexpress thenatural volume elemen tdeter- mined byginterms oftheframedx1^:::^dxnonnTMjU.Assign toUtheorientation determined bythecoordinates, andletgdenote the corresp onding volume formonTMjU!U.By(2.3)wehave g=1pdetg@1^:::^@n: Thisisrelated tothedi eren tialn-form Vol(;:::;)by X1^:::^Xn=Vol(X1;:::;Xn)1pdetg@1^:::^@n; fromwhichwecompute Vol(X1;:::;Xn)=p detgX1^:::^Xn @1^:::^@n: Thefraction ontherightde nes anantisymmetric n-linear formonthe vectors (X1;:::;Xn),whichweseeisidenticaltodx1^:::^dxn.Weare thusleadtotheformula Vol=p detgdx1^:::^dxn: (2.4) Again, thisassumes thatUMhasanorientation andthecoordinates are positivelyoriented,butwecaneasily removethisassumption. Theproper expression foravolume element ,expressed inarbitrary coordinates, isthen dvolg=p detgdx1:::dxn; where thewedges havebeenremovedtoindicate thatwearenolonger keeping trackofsigns. Thisshowshowtouselocalcoordinate patches forcomputing integralsR Mfdvolgofsmoothfunctions onRiemannian manifolds. 2.4.4 Inde nite metrics Itissometimes useful toconsider \metrics" thatarenotpositivede nite. Onarealvector bundleE!M,onecande ne aninde nite metric to beasmoothmaph;i:EE!Rwhichrestricts oneach bertoa bilinear formthatissymmetric andnondegenerate;thelatter condition means there isnononzerov2Exwithhv;wi=0forallw2Ex.An example ofsuchabilinear formonR4istheMinkowski metric ,de ned by hv;wi=vTw,whereisthesymmetric matrix =0BB@1000 0100 0010 00011CCA:44 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Aformofthistype,havingthree negativ eeigenvalues andonepositive,is saidtohaveLorentzsignature|these areimportantinEinstein's theory ofrelativit y.Infact,general relativit ydeals exclusiv elywithsmooth4- manifolds thathaveLorentzian metrics.5 Givenarealm-dimensional vectorspaceVwithaninde nite (i.e.sym- metric andnondegenerate) inner producth;i,theindex ofh;iisthe largest dimension ofanysubspaceWVonwhichh;ijWisnegativ e de nite. Thustheindex isatmostm,andiszeroifandonlyiftheinner productispositivede nite. Choosing abasis toidentifyVwith Rm,the symmetric formh;icanbewritten as hv;wi=vTw forsomesymmetric matrix .Then byastandard result inlinear algebra, =STSforsomeS2O(m)andadiagonal matrix ,thuswecan change thebasisandassume isdiagonal without lossofgeneralit y.Bythe nondegeneracy condition, mustbeinvertible, soallitsdiagonal entries arenonzero. Wecanthenrescale thebasisvectors andassume nally that takestheform m;k:= mk k forsomek2f0;:::;mg,where kdenotes thek-by-kidentitymatrix. Clearlykistheindex ofh;i. Similar remarks apply toanysmoothinde nite metrich;ionareal vector bundle:E!Mofrankm.Onany berEx,thediagonaliza- tionprocedure outlined aboveimplies thatthere isanorthonormal basis (v1;:::;vm)ofEx,whichmeans inthiscasehvi;vji=ij. Exercise 2.49. Givenanorthonormal basisonthe berEx,showthatit canbeextended toasmoothorthonormal frame oversomeopenneighbor- hoodofx.Hint: Gram-Sc hmidt! Wementiontwoimportantconsequences ofExercise 2.49: 1.Theindex ofh;iislocallyconstan t|itisthusuniquely de ned over everyconnected componentofthebaseM. 2.Theorthonormal frames giverisetoasystem oflocaltrivializations whichareorthogonal inageneralized sense. Wecanthenassume thatthetransition maps takevalues inthesubgroup O(mk;k)=fA2GL(m;R)jATm;kA=m;kg: 5Thephysical signi cance ofLoren tzsignature isthatspace-time isa4-manifold inwhichoneofthedimensions isnotliketheother three. Objectswithmass are allowedtomovethrough space-time onlyalong so-called time-like paths x(t),which satisfyh_x(t);_x(t)i>0.Thismeans thatinanycoordinate system, themotion de ned byx(t)isslowerthanacertain limiting speed|the speedoflight!Onecanalsomakea distinction betweenspace-time directions thatpoint\forward"or\backward"intime. 2.4.VECTOR BUNDLES WITH STRUCTURE 45 InthecasewhereE!Misoriented,thiscanfurther bereduced to SO(mk;k)=O(mk;k)\SL(m;R): Itshould benoted thatmorere ned notions oforientation arepossible ifkandmkarebothnonzero. Forinstance, Minkowskispace (R4;4;3) canbegivenseparate orientations forthetime-lik edirections andspace- likehypersurfaces, andtheassociated group O(1;3)(also knownasthe fullLorentzgroup)hasfourcomponentsrather thantwo.Inparticular, thecomponentsofO(1;3)aredistinguished bywhether their elemen ts preserv eorreversethedirection oftimeandtheorientation ofspace. The twocomponentsthateither preserv eorreversebothmakeupSO(1;3),and thesubgroup SO(1;3)+SO(1;3)thatpreserv esbothiscalled theproper orthochronous Lorentzgroup.(Seeforexample [SU01].) Formetrics onthetangen tbundle ofasmoothmanifold, most ofthe basic theory ofRiemannian geometry (connections, curvature, geodesics etc.) applies justaswelltotheinde nite case. Ontheother hand the existence result, Proposition 2.38,doesnotapply tononpositivemetrics ingeneral. Forexample onecanusecovering spaces toshowthatS2does notadmit anymetric ofindex 1(see[Spi99,Problem 9.7]). Exercise 2.50. Adapt theargumen tsofExample 2.48towrite downthe natural volume elemen tdetermined byaninde nite metric. Onething to bewareofhereisthatdetgmaybenegativ e;butthiscanbe xed by inserting theappropriate signchanges. 2.4.5 Symplectic structures Onarealvector spaceVofevendimension 2m,asymplectic structure is anantisymmetric bilinear form !:VV!R whichisnondegenerate,inthesense that!(v;w)=0forallw2Vonly ifv=0.Note thatbyasimple argumen tinlinear algebra, there isno symplectic structure onanodd-dimensional vector space (Proveit!).The standard symplectic structure onR2misde ned as !0(v;w)=vTJ0w; whereJ0isthestandard complex structure. Fortwosymplectic vector spaces (V;!1)and(W;!2),alinear mapA:V!Wiscalled symple cticif !2(Av;Aw)=!1(v;w)46 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES forallv;w2V.Byconstructing anappropriate basis(asymple cticbasis), onecanshowthateverysymplectic vectorspace (V;!)ofdimension 2mis symplectically isomorphic to(R2m;!0).Wedenote bySp(m)GL(2m;R) thesubgroup consisting ofinvertible symplectic linear maps. Onecannowde ne asymple cticstructur eonavector bundle:E! Mofrank2masasmoothfamily ofsymplectic structures onthe bers, i.e.asmoothmap !:EE!R thatde nes asymplectic structure oneach ber.Thepair(E;!)isthen called asymple cticvectorbundle,andwehavethefollowing statemen t aboutlocaltrivializations: Proposition 2.51. If(E;!)isasymple cticvectorbundleoverM,thenfor everyx2M,thereisanopenneighb orhoodx2UMandasymplectic trivialization, i.e.atrivialization :EjU!UR2m suchthattheresulting linearmapsEx!fxgR2mareallsymple ctic (withrespectto!andthestandar dsymple cticstructur e!0onR2m). Theprooffollowstheusual recipe:oneneeds toconstruct asymple ctic frameinaneighborhoodofx,whichisnomore dicult inprinciple than constructing asymplectic basis onasingle vector space. Weleavethe details asanexercise. Adapting theremarks followingProposition 2.41tothissetting, asym- plectic vectorbundle canalternativ elybede ned asabundle withasystem oflocaltrivializations forwhichthetransition maps takevaluesinSp(m). Notethateverysymplectic bundle (E;!)ofrankminherits anatural volume form, de ned onthedualbundleEby !m=!^:::^!: Thatthisisnonzero followsfromthenondegeneracy of!.Thussymplectic bundles havenatural orientations andvolume elemen ts;thisisrelated to thefactthateverysymplectic matrixA2Sp(m)hasdeterminan tone, i.e.Sp(m)SL(2m;R). Example 2.52(Hermitian bundles assymplectic bundles ).AHer- mitian bundle (E;h;i)ofrankmcanberegarded asarealbundle ofrank 2m,withacomplex structureJandacomplex-v alued bilinear form hv;wi=g(v;w)+i!(v;w); wheregand!arerealbilinear forms. Itiseasytocheckthatgde nes aEuclidean structure ontherealbundleE,while!de nes asymplectic 2.4.VECTOR BUNDLES WITH STRUCTURE 47 structure. Thusaunitary trivialization onsomesubsetUMisalsoboth anorthogonal trivialization andasymplectic trivialization. Thisisrelated totheconvenientfactthatifGL(m;C)isregarded asthesubgroup of matrices inGL(2m;R)thatcomm utewiththestandard complex structure J0,then U(m)=O(2m)\Sp(m): Conversely,everysymplectic bundle (E;!)canbegivenacompatible complex structureJ,suchthatg:=!(;J)de nes aEuclidean metric andh;i:=g+i!becomes aHermitian metric. (See[HZ94]foraproof ofthisfact.) Thusthere isaclosecorresp ondence betweensymplectic and complex bundles. Example 2.53(Symplectic manifolds ).JustasinRiemannian geome- try,themostimportantexamples ofsymplectic vectorbundles aretangen t bundles, though hereitisappropriate toaddoneextra condition. If!isa symplectic structure onTMforsomesmooth2n-dimensional manifoldM, thenthepair(M;!)iscalled analmost symple cticmanifold .Thecondi- tionforremovingtheword\almost" comes fromobserving that!isnowa di eren tial2-form onM;wecallitasymple cticform,andthepair(M;!) asymple cticmanifold ,if!satis es the\integrabilit ycondition" d!=0: Theimportance ofthiscondition lieslargely inthefollowingresult, which showsthatallsymplectic manifolds arelocallythesame. Proposition 2.54(Darb oux's theorem) .If(M;!)isasymple cticmani- foldandx2M,thensomeneighb orhoodofxadmits acoordinate system (q1;:::;qn;p1;:::;pn)inwhich!takesthecanonic alform !=nX k=1dpk^dqk: See[Arn89 ]or[HZ94]foraproof.There isnosuchstatemen tforRie- mannian manifolds, where thecurvatur ede ned byametricgprovides an obstruction fordi eren tmanifolds tobelocallyisometric. Thussymplectic geometry isquiteadi eren tsubject,andalldi erences betweensymplectic manifolds manifest themselv esontheglobalrather thanlocallevel|this isthesubjectofthe eldknownassymple ctictopology. Some motivation forthestudy ofsymplectic manifolds comes fromthe factthattheyarethenatural geometric setting forstudying Hamiltonian systems. Givenasymplectic manifold (M;!)andasmoothfunctionH: M!R,there isaunique smoothvector eld,theHamiltonian vector eld XH2Vec(M),de ned bythecondition !(XH;)=dH:48 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Onethenconsiders solutionsx:R!Mtothedi eren tialequation _x(t)=XH(x(t)).Thismayseemrather arbitrary at rst,butanyphysicist willrecognize theformthat_x=XH(x)takesinthespecialcoordinates provided byDarboux's theorem: writing x(t)=(q1(t);:::;qn(t);p1(t);:::;pn(t)); we ndthatfork2f1;:::;ng, _qk=@H @pkand _pk=@H @qk: These areHamilton's equations fromclassical mechanics, whichdetermine themotion ofasystem withndegrees offreedom inphase space. Thusthe symplectic form!isprecisely thestructure needed forde ning Hamilton's equations inageometrically invariantwayonM. WerefertothebookbyArnold [Arn89 ]forfurther details. 2.4.6 Arbitrary G-structures Onething alloftheexamples abovehaveincommon isthateachstructure de nes asystem ofpreferred localtrivializations (e.g.theorthogonal, or symplectic trivializations), withtransition maps thattakevalues insome propersubgroupGGL(m;F).Wenowformalize thisidea. De nition 2.55. Let:E!Mbeavector bundle ofrankm,and supposeGisasubgroup ofGL(m;F).AG-structur eonEisamaximal system ofsmoothlocaltrivializations  :EjU !U Fmwhichcover MandhavesmoothG-valued transition maps: g :U \U !G: Thetrivializations (U ; )arecalledG-compatible. Thisde nition israther hardtouseinpractice, because oneseldom wantstoconstruct asystem oflocaltrivializations explicitly .Butwhat itlacksinpracticalit y,itmakesupforinstriking generalit y:allofthe structures we'veconsidered sofararespecialcases ofG-structures. On arealvector bundle forinstance, bundle metrics areequivalenttoO(m)- structures, volume forms areSL(m;R)-structures andsymplectic struc- turesareSp(m)-structures. These particular examples canallbeexpressed interms ofsome chosen tensor eldonE,suchasametric orsymplec- ticform|but ingeneral onecande neG-structures thathavenothing directly todowithanytensor eld. Indeed, thenotion makessense for anysubgroupGGL(m;F).Oneshould ofcourse beawarethatgivenG andabundleE,itcannot beassumed thatG-structures alwaysexist|this 2.5.INFINITE DIMENSIONAL BUNDLES 49 isn'teventrueformostoftheexamples above,e.g.avolume formexists onlyifEisorientable. Wecangeneralize onestepfurther byconsidering notjustsubgroups of GL(m;F)butarbitrary groups thatadmitm-dimensional representations . Byde nition, anm-dimensional (realorcomplex) represen tation ofGisa group homomorphism :G!GL(m;F); thusassociating witheachelemen tg2Ganm-by-mmatrix(g).The represen tation iscalled faithful ifisaninjectiv ehomomorphism, inwhich caseitidenti esGwithasubgroup ofGL(m;F).More generally ,we cannowmakesense ofthetermG-valuedtransition mapwhenev eran m-dimensional represen tation ofGisgiven,sinceg2Gthenactsonvec- torsv2Fmviathematrix(g).Therepresen tation neednotbefaithful, andGneednotbeasubgroup ofGL(m;F). 2.5In nite dimensional vector bundles With alittlecare,thetheory ofsmoothmanifolds andvector bundles can beextended toin nite dimensional settings, withquite powerfulconse- quences inthestudy ofdi eren tialequations. Wewon'tgoverydeeply intothissubjectbecause theanalysis israther involved|but wecanat leastpresen tthemain ideas, andanexample thatshould besucien t motivation forfurther study. In nite dimensional spaces aretypically function spaces, e.g.C1(M;Rn), thespace ofallsmoothmaps fromasmoothcompact manifoldMtoRn. Oneofthemostremark ablefactsaboutdi eren tialcalculus isthatmostof itcanbeextended inanelegan twaytoin nite dimensional vectorspaces| however,thespaces forwhichthisworksarenotarbitrary .Wearemost interested inthefollowingspecialclassofobjects. De nition 2.56. ABanach spaceisavector spaceXwithanormkk suchthateveryCauchysequence converges. Recall thataCauchysequencexk2Xisanysequence forwhichthe distanceskxkxjkapproac hzeroasbothkandjgo(indep enden tly) toin nit y.Thenontrivial aspectofaBanac hspace isthatgivenany suchsequence, there exists anelemen tx2Xsuchthatkxxkk!0, i.e.xk!x.Metric spaces withthispropertyarecalled complete . Therequiremen tseems likenothing at rstglance because, infact, all nite dimensional normed vector spaces (realorcomplex) areBanac h spaces. ThespacesCk(M;Rn)withk<1arealsoBanac hspaces when givensuitable norms, e.g.thestandard norm onC1([0;1];Rn)is kfk=sup x2[0;1]jf(x)j+sup x2[0;1]jf0(x)j:50 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Similarly ,onanysmoothvector bundle:E!Moveracompact base M,thespacesCk(E)ofk-times di eren tiable sections areBanac hspaces.6 Ontheother hand, spaces consisting ofsmoothmaps, e.g.C1(M;Rn) and(E),generally arenot.Thispresen tsabitofatechnical annoyance, because onewouldgenerally prefer toworkonlywithspaces ofsmooth maps. We'lluseastandard trick(Exercise 2.64)togetaround thisproblem inourexample below. Onething tobewareofinBanac hspaces isthatnotalllinear maps arecontinuous. FortwoBanac hspaces XandY,wedenote thespace of continuous linear mapsX!YbyL(X;Y),withL(X):=L(X;X).An invertible mapA:X!Yisnowcalled anisomorphism ifbothAand A1arecontinuous. ThespaceL(X;Y)admits anatural norm, de ned by kAkL(X;Y)=sup x2Xnf0gkAxkY kxkX; andL(X;Y)isthenalsoaBanac hspace. Wenowsummarize somefactsaboutcalculus inBanac hspaces. Thisis nottheplace toexplore thesubjectinanydetail, buttheinterested reader mayconsult thebookbyLang [Lan93 ]to llinthegaps. Tostartwith, thefollowingde nition should lookveryfamiliar. De nition 2.57. LetXandYberealBanac hspaces, withUXan opensubset. Then afunction F:U!Yisdi erentiable atx2Uif there exists acontinuouslinear mapdF(x)2L(X;Y)suchthatforall sucien tlysmallh2X, F(x+h)=F(x)+dF(x)h+khkX(h); where isamapfromaneighborhoodof02XintoYwithlimh!0(h)= 0.Thelinear operator dF(x)iscalled thederivative (oralsolinearization ) ofFatx. ThemapF:U!Yiscontinuously di erentiable onUifdF(x)exists forallx2Uandde nes acontinuousfunction dF:U!L(X;Y). NotethatFisautomatically continuousatx2Uifitisdi eren tiable there. Thede nition canbeapplied tocomplex Banac hspaces aswellby treating them asrealBanac hspaces. Thederivativeisthenrequired tobe onlyareallinear map.7 6Technically ,oneshould notcalltheseBanac hspaces butrather Banachable ,because although theydobecome Banac hspaces when givensuitable norms, these norms are notcanonical. Onemustthenshowthatallsuitable choices ofnorms areequivalent , meaning thattheyallde ne thesame notion ofconvergence. 7Amapwithacomplex linear derivativeiscalled complex analytic |the study of these isadi eren tsubjectaltogether. 2.5.INFINITE DIMENSIONAL BUNDLES 51 ThederivativeofamapfromanopensetintoaBanac hspace hasnow beende ned asanother mapfromanopensetintoaBanac hspace. Thus theprocesscanbeiterated, de ning higher derivativesandthenotion of smoothmapsU!Y.Standard features ofdi eren tialcalculus suchas thesumrule,productruleandchainruleallhaveelegan tgeneralizations tothissetting. Thede nitions sofarmakesense forallnormed vector spaces, not justBanac hspaces. Ontheother hand, thecompleteness condition plays acrucial roleinprovingthefollowinggeneralization ofastandard result fromadvanced calculus. Theorem 2.58 (InverseFunction Theorem) .LetXandYbeBanach spaces,UXanopensubset, andF:U!Yasmoothmapsuchthat forsomex2UwithF(x)=y2Y,thederivative dF(x):X!Y isanisomorphism. Thenthereareopenneighb orhoodsx2UUand y2VYsuchthattherestriction ofFtoUisaninvertible mapU!V. Itsinverse F1isalsosmooth,and d(F1)(y)=(dF(x))1:Y!X: There issimilarly anin nite dimensional version oftheimplicit func- tiontheorem, whichcanbetreated asacorollary oftheinversefunction theorem. Wereferto[Lan93 ]foraprecise statemen t,andtheproofsof bothresults. Wecannowde ne smoothmanifolds andvector bundles modeled on Banac hspaces. Herewewillpresen tonlyabriefdiscussion ofthemain de nitions|the recommended reference forthismaterial isLang's geome- trybook[Lan99 ]. De nition 2.59. AsmoothBanach manifold isaHausdor topological space MwithanopencoveringM=S U andasystem ofcharts ' :U ! ; where each isanopensubset ofsome Banac hspaceX ,andthetran- sition maps ' '1 aresmoothwherev ertheyarede ned. De nition 2.60. GivenasmoothBanac hmanifold M,aBanach space bundle:E!MoverMisasmoothBanac hmanifold Ewithasmooth surjectiv emap,suchthateach berEx=1(x)forx2MisaBanac h space, andthere isasystem oflocaltrivializationsf(U ; )g,where the opensetsfU gcoverM,andf gisasetofhomeomorphisms  :1(U )!U Y :52 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES HereY isaBanac hspace, andtherestriction of toeach berisa Banac hspace isomorphism. Furthermore, these trivializations mustbe smoothlycompatible,inthatfor 6= , 1 takestheform (x;v)7!(x;g (x)v) wherev eritisde ned, andthetransition maps g :U \U !L(Y ;Y ) areallsmooth. Thislastpointaboutthetransition mapsg containssomeveryserious analysis inthein nite dimensional case,foritisastronger condition than justrequiring that (U \U )Y !Y :(x;v)7!g (x)v beasmoothmap. Unlikein nite dimensional calculus, where maps are usually presumed smoothuntilprovennonsmo oth,ittypically takescon- siderable e ort toprovethatamapbetweenBanac hspaces issmooth. Thustheconstruction ofasmoothBanac hmanifold orbundle structure onanygivenobjectcanbearather involvedprocess,evenifonecansee intuitivelythatcertain spaces should beBanac hmanifolds. Averygeneral procedure forthese constructions onso-called \manifolds ofmaps" was presen tedinapaperbyH.Eliasson [El67],whose ideascanbeapplied to theexample below. Example 2.61 (Stabilit yofperiodicorbits ).Consider asmoothn- dimensional manifoldMwithasmoothtime-dep enden tvector eldXt whichis1-periodicintime, i.e.Xtisasmoothfamily ofsmoothvector elds suchthatXt+1Xt.Wewishtoconsider theorbitsx:R!Mof thedynamical system _x(t)=Xt(x(t)); (2.5) andparticularly those thatare1-periodic,satisfyingx(t+1)=x(t).Such asolution canberegarded asamapx:S1!M,where thecircleS1is de ned asR=Z.Denote byt:M!Mthe owofthissystem fromtime 0totimet,i.e.tisasmoothfamily ofdi eomorphisms suchthatforany x02M,x(t):=t(x0)istheunique orbitof(2.5)withx(0)=x0.8 Givenany1-periodicsolutionx(t)withx(0)=x0,wecalltheorbit nondegenerateifthelinear isomorphism d1(x0):Tx0M!Tx0M 8tmaynotbeglobally wellde ned ifMisnoncompact, butthiswillcause no problem inourdiscussion. 2.5.INFINITE DIMENSIONAL BUNDLES 53 doesnothave1asaneigenvalue. Thisimplies thattheorbitisisolate d, i.e.there isnoother 1-periodicorbitinsome neighborhoodofthisone(a proofisoutlined inExercise 2.63). Nondegeneracy hasanevenstronger consequence: thattheorbit is \stable" under small perturbations ofthesystem. Tostatethisprecisely , addanextra parameter tothevector eldX t,producing asmooth2- parameter family ofvector elds, 1-periodicint,withtherealnumber varying oversome neighborhoodof0suchthat X0 tXt: Thiswillbecalled asmooth1-parameter perturbation ofthetimedependen t vector eldXt.Weaimtoprovethefollowing: Theorem 2.62. Given anynondegenerate1-periodicorbitx(t)ofthesys- tem(2.5)andasmooth1-parameter perturbationX tofXt,thereisa unique smooth1-parameter family ofloops x:S1!M forinasuciently smallneighb orhoodof0,suchthat_x=X t(x)and x0(t)x(t). Exercise 2.63. Thefollowingargumen tprovesbothTheorem 2.62and theprevious statemen tthatanondegenerate periodicorbitisisolated. Let MMdenote thediagonal submanifold =f(x;x)jx2Mg,and consider theembedding F:M!MM:x7!(x;1(x)): ShowthatFintersects transversely atF(x0)2ifandonlyifthe orbitx(t)isnondegenerate. Theresult followsfrom thisviathe nite dimensional implicit function theorem| ll inthegaps. (See[Hir94]for more ontransv ersalit yanditsimplications.) Alternative proofofTheorem2.62.LeavingasideExercise 2.63forthemo- ment,theresult canalsobeprovedbysetting upthesystem (2.5)asa smoothsection ofaBanac hspace bundle. Assume forsimplicit ythatM isorientable (thisrestriction canberemovedwithalittlecleverness). We rstaskthereader tobelievethatthespace ofmaps B:=C1(S1;M) admits anatural smoothBanac hmanifold structure, suchthatforeachx2 C1(S1;M),thetangen tspaceTxBiscanonically isomorphic toaBanac h space ofsections onthepullbac kbundle (cf.Example 2.35), TxB=C1(xTM):54 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES ThusTB!BisasmoothBanac hspace bundle. Itiscontained inanother smoothBanac hspace bundleE!B,with bers Ex=C0(xTM): Allofthese statemen tscanbeprovedrigorously using theformalism of Eliasson [El67].Wenowconstruct asmoothsection s:B!Easfollows. ForaC1-loopx:S1!M,s(x)willbetheC0-vector eldalongxgiven by s(x)(t)=_x(t)Xt(x(t)): Thefactthatthissection issmoothalsofollowsfrom[El67].Clearly , theC1-solutions ofthesystem (2.5)areprecisely thezeros ofthesection s:B!E. Exercise 2.64. ShowthatanyCk-solution to(2.5)isactually ofclass Ck+1.Byinduction then,allC1-solutions aresmooth!(This isthesimplest example ofanellipticbootstrapping argumen t.) WecannowattackTheorem 2.62viathein nite dimensional implicit function theorem. Letx2Bbeanorbit of(2.5),hences(x)=0.By choosing appropriate charts andlocaltrivializations, wecanidentifythe section sinaneighborhoodofx2Bwithsome smoothmap F:U!Y; where XandYareBanac hspaces, UXisanopenneighborhoodof0 andF(0)=0.Wecanalsoassume without lossofgeneralit ythatthezero sets1(0)inaneighborhoodofxcorresp ondstothesetF1(0). Lemma 2.65. Thelinearization dF(0):X!Yisanisomorphism. WepostponetheproofofthisuntilChapter 3,where wewilldevelop aconvenientmeans ofcomputing dF(0)viacovariantderivatives|this is where theassumption thatMisorientable willbeused. Toseetheimpli- cations forstabilit yofperiodicorbits, consider nowasmooth1-parameter perturbation X tofthevector eldXt.Thiscanbeviewedasa1-parameter perturbation softhesection s,orequivalently,asmoothmap eF:(;)U!Y:(;u)7!F(u) where (;)Risasucien tlysmall intervalandF0F.Thelin- earization deF(0;0):RX!Ytakestheform deF(0;0)(h;v)=h@eF @(0;0)+dF(0)v; anditfollowseasily from Lemma 2.65thatthisoperator issurjectiv e, withaone-dimensional kernel. Thusbytheimplicit function theorem, 2.5.INFINITE DIMENSIONAL BUNDLES 55 some neighborhoodof0intheseteF1(0)isasmoothone-dimensional submanifold of(;)U.Itfollowsthatthesame istruefortheset f(;y)2(;)Bjs(y)=0g; andmoduloafewanalytical details, thisimplies Theorem 2.62. Thepreceding mayseem likeanunwarrantedamoun tofe ort given thatwealready sawamore elemen taryproofinExercise 2.63.Thereal reason toconsider thisapproac histhatasimilar argumen tcanbeapplied tothestudy ofcertain systems ofpartial di eren tialequations, where no such nite dimensional metho disavailable. Wenowlookbrie y atan example thatisimportantinsymplectic topology. Example 2.66(Pseudoholomorphic curves).GivenamanifoldWof dimension 2n,analmost complex structur eonWisacomplex structure J2(End(TW))onitstangen tbundle, i.e.foreachx2W,Jde nes a linear mapTxW!TxWwithJ2=Id.Thisgivesthetangen tbundle TW!Wthestructure ofacomplex vector bundle withrankn(cf. Section 2.4),andthepair(W;J)iscalled analmost complex manifold .For n=1,analmost complex manifold (;j)isalsocalled aRiemann surface GivenaRiemann surface (;j)andanalmost complex manifold (W;J) ofdimension 2n,amapu:!Wiscalled apseudoholomorphic (or J-holomorphic )curve ifitsatis es Tuj=JTu: (2.6) Working inlocalcoordinates onbothmanifolds, (2.6)becomes asys- temof2n rstorder partial di eren tialequations intwovariables (since dim=2),called thenonline arCauchy-R iemann equations .Thenext exercise explains thereason forthisterminology . Exercise 2.67. If(;j)=(W;J)=(C;i),showthatamapf:C!C satis es (2.6)ifandonlyifitisananalytic function. Thein nite dimensional implicit function theorem canbeapplied to thestudy ofJ-holomorphic curvesjustasinExample 2.61. Exercise 2.68. Without worrying abouttheanalytical details, writedown aBanac hspace bundleEovertheBanac hmanifoldB:=C1(;W)and asectionB!Ewhose zeros areprecisely theJ-holomorphic curvesu: (;j)!(W;J)ofclassC1.(AsinExercise 2.64,itturns outthatanysuch solution isactually asmoothmap, duetoellipticregularity theory.Note thattechnically ,mustbecompact inorder toapply Eliasson's formalism, butthere arevarious waystoworkaround thisforcertain noncompact domains.) MuchmoreonJ-holomorphic curvescanbefound inthebookbyMc- Du andSalamon [MS04].56 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES 2.6General berbundles Bynowitshould beapparen tthatvector bundles areworthyofstudy. Wenextexamine someobjectsthatclearly deserv etobecalled \bundles," though their bersarenotvector spaces. Example 2.69(Framebundles ).Recall thatif:E!Misasmooth vector bundle ofrankm,aframeoversome subsetUMisanordered set(v1;:::;vm)ofsmoothsectionsvj2(EjU)whichspaneach berEx forx2U.Restricting toasingle ber,aframe onExissimply anordered basisofEx.Denote byFExthesetofallframes onEx,andlet FE=[ x2MFEx: Thisspace hasanatural topology andsmoothmanifold structure suchthat anyframe overanopensubsetUMde nes asmoothmapU!FE. Wecanalsode ne asmoothprojection mapF:FE!Msuchthat 1 F(x)=FExforallx2M.Itseems natural tocallthesets1 F(x) bers,andF:FE!Miscalled theframebundleofE.The bersFEx arenotvector spaces, butrather smoothmanifolds. Exercise 2.70. Showthatforeachx2M,FExcanbeidenti ed with thegeneral linear group GL(m;F),though notinacanonical way. Asection ofthebundleFE!MoversomesubsetUMisde ned| predictably|as amaps:U!FEsuchthats=IdU.Thusasmooth sections:U!FEisprecisely aframe overUforthevector bundleE, andwedenote thespace ofsuchsections by(FEjU).Twothings must beobserv ed: (i)(FEjU)isnotavectorspace, though itdoeshaveanatural topology, i.e.onecande ne what itmeans forasequence ofsmoothsections sk2(FEjU)toconverge(uniformly withallderivatives)toanother smoothsections2(FEjU). (ii)Sectionss:U!FEcanalwaysbede ned oversucien tlysmall opensubsetsUM,butthere mightnotbeanyglobalsections s:M!FE.Indeed, suchasection exists ifandonlyifthevector bundleE!Mistrivializable. Example 2.71(Unitsphere bundles anddiskbundles ).Givenareal vector bundle:E!Mofrankmwithasmoothbundle metrich;i, de ne Sm1E=fv2Ejhv;vi=1g: Then therestriction oftoSm1Eisanother surjectiv emapp:Sm1E! M,whose bersp1(x)areeachdi eomorphic tothesphereSm1. 2.6.GENERAL FIBER BUNDLES 57 Asections:M!Sm1Eissimply asection ofthevector bundle Ewhose values areunitvectors. Unitsphere bundles cansometimes be useful asalternativ edescriptions ofvectorbundles: theycarry allthesame information, buthavethenicepropertythatifMiscompact, soisthetotal spaceSm1E.Inparticular, if(M;g)isacompact Riemannian n-manifold, thenS1TMisacompact (2n1)-manifold, andthegeodesicequation on Mde nes asmoothvector eldonS1TM. Aclosely related objectisthediskbundle DmE=fv2Ejhv;vi1g; with bersthataresmoothcompact manifolds withboundary .Suchob- jectsarisenaturally intheconstruction oftubular neighb orhoods:givena manifoldMandaclosed submanifold NM,itturns outthataneigh- borhoodofNinMcanalwaysbeidenti ed withadiskbundle overN, with bersofdimension dimMdimN(cf.[Bre93 ]). Clearly itisuseful toconsider bundles whose bersarealldi eomorphic manifolds, varying overthebaseinsomesmoothway.Eachoftheexamples sofarhasbeende ned interms ofagivenvector bundle, butthisneedn't bethecaseingeneral, asthenextexample shows. Example 2.72(Mapping tori).SupposeNisasmoothn-manifold and ':N!Nisadi eomorphism. Then wede ne themapping torus of' tobethesmooth(n+1)-manifold M'=(RN)=; withtheequivalence relation de ned by(t;x)(t+1;'(x)).Theprojec- tionRN!Rthendescends toasmoothsurjectiv emap :M'!S1:=R=Z; withthe\ bers"(M')[t]:=1([t])alldi eomorphic toN.Toseethat the bersvary\smoothly" withrespecttot2S1,wecanconstruct \local trivializations" :1(U)!UNoveropensubsetsUS1.For example, regardingU1:=(0;1)asanopensubset ofS1,thereistheobvious di eomorphism 1:1(U1)!U1Nde ned by 1([(t;x)])=(t;x) fort2(0;1): Thesame expression witht21 2;3 2 givesawellde ned di eomorphism 2:1(U2)!U2NfortheopensetU2:=1 2;3 2 S1.Observ ethat U1[U2coversS1,thusthetwotrivializationsfUj;jgj2f1;2gdetermine what wewillmomen tarily de ne asa\smooth berbundle structure" for :M'!S1.58 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Notice thatthecoordinate vector eldeV(t;x)=@ @tonRNdescends toawellde ned smoothvector eldVonthetotalspaceM',whose 1- periodicorbits canbeidenti ed withthe xedpointsof'.Inthiswaythe mapping torus canbeusedtoanalyze xedpointsbychanging adiscrete dynamical system intoacontinuous dynamical system. Thisnextexample similarly hasnodirect relation toanyvectorbundle. Example 2.73(TheHopf bration ).RegardS3astheunitsphere in C2,andde ne amapwithvalues intheextended complex plane by :S3!C[f1g:(z1;z2)7!z1 z2: Using thestereographic projection toidentifyC[f1gwithS2,themap :S3!S2turns outtobesmooth,andits bers1(z)aresetsofthe formfei(z1;z2)j2Rgfor xed (z1;z2)2S3C2.Thuswehavea berbundle:S3!S2with bersdi eomorphic toS1.Suchobjects arecalled circlebundles,andthisoneinparticular isknownastheHopf bration.Itplaysanimportantroleinhomotop ytheory|in particular,  isthesimplest (andinsome sense thearchetypal) example ofamapfrom S3toS2thatcannot bedeformed continuously totheidentity.Theproof ofthisfactusesageneral result thatrelates thehigher homotop ygroups ofthetotalspace, berandbaseofany berbundle. Foratopologist, this givesmore thansucien tmotivation forthestudy of berbundles. Herenowarethede nitions|w eonceagain begininapurely topolog- icalcontext,andsubsequen tlyincorp orate thenotion ofsmoothness. De nition 2.74. A berbundleconsists ofthree topological spacesE,M andF,called thetotalspace,baseandstandar d berrespectively,together withacontinuoussurjectiv emap:E!Msuchthatforeverypointx2 Mthere exists anopenneighborhoodx2UMandalocaltrivialization :1(U)!UF: Hereisahomeomorphism thattakes1(x)tofxgFforeachx2U. The bersEx:=1(x)ofa berbundle arethushomeomorphic to some xedspaceF,byhomeomorphisms thatvarycontinuously overthe base.Remark 2.75.Geometers often usetheterms bration and berbundle synonymously ,though theformer hasaslightlymore general meaning in topology,cf.[ Hat02 ]. De nition 2.76. Suppose:E!Misa berbundle withstandard ber F,suchthatMandFarebothsmoothmanifolds. Asmoothstructur eon :E!Misamaximal setoflocaltrivializationsfU ; gsuchthatthe opensetsfU gcoverMandthemapsf garedi eomorphisms. 2.7.STRUCTURE GROUPS 59 Weseefromthisde nition thatasmooth berbundle haseach berdif- feomorphic tothestandard berF,bydi eomorphisms thatvarysmoothly overM.It'snothardtoshowfromthisthatthetotalspaceEisthena smoothmanifold ofdimension dimM+dimF. Theterms section and berpreserving maphavethesamede nition in thiscontextasforavector bundle. 2.7Structure groups Theversion ofa berbundle de ned aboveissomewhat weakerthanthe de nition giveninsometexts, notably theclassic bookbySteenro d[Ste51]. Thestricter de nition includes anextra pieceofstructure, called thestruc- turegroupofabundle. Toexplain this,wewillneedtoassume some knowledge oftopological groups andLiegroups, whicharediscussed in Appendix B. ThemostimportantLiegroups areofcourse thelinear groups: GL(n;F), SL(n;F),O(n),SU(n),Sp(n)andsoforth, allofwhicharisenaturally in thestudy ofvectorbundles withextra structure suchasbundle metrics or volume forms. Inthestudy ofgeneral berbundles, onealsoencoun ters various \in nite dimensional groups," suchasthefollowingexamples. For anytopological spaceF,there isthegroup Homeo (F)=f':F!Fj'isbijectiv e,'and'1bothcontinuousg: Onanorientedtopological manifold, thishasanimportantsubgroup Homeo+(F)=f'2Homeo(F)j'preserv esorientationg; wereferto[Hat02 ]forthede nition of\orien tation preserving" onatopo- logical manifold. IfFisasmoothmanifold, wehavethecorresp onding subgroups Di (F)=f'2Homeo(F)j'and'1aresmoothg; andintheorientedcase, Di +(F)=f'2Di (F)j'preserv esorientationg: There arestillother groups corresp onding toextra structures onasmooth manifoldF,suchasaRiemannian metricgorasymplectic form!.These twoinparticular giverisetothegroups ofisometries andsymple ctomor- phisms respectively, Isom(F;g)=f'2Di (F)j'ggg; Symp(F;!)=f'2Di (F)j'!!g:60 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Mostoftheseexamples arein nite dimensional,9whichintroduces some complications fromananalytical pointofview. They cannot beconsidered smoothLiegroups, though theyclearly aretopological groups. Givenatopological groupGandatopological spaceF,wesaythatG actscontinuously fromtheleftonFifthere isacontinuousmap GF!F:(a;x)7!ax satisfying ex=x and (ab)x=a(bx) foralla;b2Gandx2F,wheree2Gistheidentityelemen t.The simplest example isthenatural action ofanysubgroupGHomeo(F)on F,de ned by(';x)7!'(x). Similarly ,arightaction FG!F:(x;a)7!xa mustsatisfy xe=x andx(ab)=(xa)b: Forexample, asubgroupGHomeo (F)de nes arightaction onFby (x;')7!'1(x).Foranyleftorrightaction, theoperation ofanysingle group elemen ta2GonFde nes ahomeomorphism. Youshould takeamomen ttoconvince yourself thatthede nitions of \leftaction" and\rightaction" arenotfullyequivalent:thekeyisthe associativit ycondition. Forinstance, themap(x;')7!'1(x)mentioned abovede nes onlyarightaction, notaleftaction. Ontheother hand, anyleftaction (a;x)7!axde nes acorresp onding rightaction by(x;a)7!a1x,andviceversa. Inthiswayonecanswitch backandforth betweenleftandrightactions forthesakeofnotational convenience; thedistinction isessentially amatter ofbookkeeping. Remark 2.77.Thefollowingexample showswhyitcanbeconvenientto consider bothleftandrightactions inthesame discussion. Forsome topological groupG,letF=Gandconsider thenatural actionsG F!FandFG!Fde ned bygroup multiplication. These de ne homeomorphisms ofFbyLa(h)=ahandRb(h)=hbforeverya;b2G, andduetotheassociativelaw,LaRb=RbLa.Thiswillbeuseful when wede ne thegroup action onframe bundles inSection 2.8. Theterms smoothleft/right action nowhaveobvious de nitions ifGis aLiegroup andFisasmoothmanifold. Inthiscase,eachelemen ta2G de nes adi eomorphism onF. 9Theexception isIsom(F;g),whichisgenerated in nitessimally bythe nite dimen- sional space ofKillingvector elds;seee.g.[GHL04 ]. 2.7.STRUCTURE GROUPS 61 Wearenowready torelate allofthisto berbundles. Foragen- eralbundle:E!M,it'sclear thatanytwolocaltrivializations  :1(U )!U Fand :1(U )!U Fcanberelated by  1 (x;p)=(x;g (x)p) (2.7) whereg :U \U !Homeo(F)isacontinuous\transition map," de ned interms ofthenatural leftaction ofHomeo(F)onF.Atthemostbasic levelthen, wecansaythatthebundle:E!M\hasstructure group Homeo(F)". De nition 2.78. Suppose:E!Misa berbundle, withstandard berF,andGisatopological group. Areduction ofthestructur egroup ofthisbundle toGisasystem oflocaltrivializationsfU ; gsuchthat fU gisanopencoveringofM,andthemaps  arerelated toeachother asin(2.7)byafamily ofcontinuoustransition maps g :U \U !G; acting onthetrivializations viasome continuousleftactionGF!F. When:E!Misasmooth berbundle andGisaLiegroup acting smoothly onthestandard berF,weadditionally require thetransition maps tobesmooth. Ifsuchareduction exists, wesaythatthebundle:E!Mhas structur egroupG.A berbundle withstructure groupGiscalled aG- bundle. Fora berbundle withextra structure, itisappropriate tointroduce asomewhat restricted notion ofbundle isomorphism. De nition 2.79. Suppose1:E1!Mand2:E2!Maretwo G-bundles withthesame standard berFandthesameG-action onF. Then aG-bundleisomorphism isa berpreserving homeomorphism (or di eomorphism) f:E1!E2suchthatforeverypairoflocaltrivializations  :1 1(U )!U Fand :1 2(U )!U F,there isacontinuous (orsmooth)mapf :U \U !Gwith f1 (x;p)=(x;f (x)p): Steenro d[Ste51]regards thestructure group aspartoftheintrinsic structure ofa berbundle, included inthede nition. Inprinciple, our de nition isequivalenttohissimply bynaming Homeo(F)asthestructure group|but thisisbesidethepoint,because manyofthemostinteresting cases arethose where thestructure group canbereduced toasimpler groupG,particularly ifGisa nite dimensional Liegroup. It'stimeforsome examples.62 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Example 2.80 (Vector bundles withstructure ).Asmoothvector bundle:E!Mofrankmcannowbede nedasasmooth berbundle withstandard berFmandstructure group GL(m;F),whichactsonFm inthenatural way.Thenotion ofaGL(m;F)-bundle isomorphism isthen equivalenttoourprevious de nition ofvector bundle isomorphism. Thegroup reduces further ifthebundle isgivenextra structure: forin- stance, aEuclidean orHermitian bundle metric reduces GL(m;F)toO(m) orU(m)respectively,while avolume formyields SL(m;F).Thecombina- tionofaHermitian metric andcompatible complex volume formreduces thestructure toSU(m).There arecorresp onding statemen tsaboutsym- plectic structures (Sp(m)),inde nite metrics (O(mk;k))andsoforth. Indeed, avector bundle withaG-structure foranyLiegroupGcanbe de ned asa berbundle withstandard berFmandstructure groupG, whereGactsonFmviasomegivengroup represen tation. Eachsuchstruc- turecomes withitsownde nition ofabundle isomorphism; forinstance, asmoothvector bundle isomorphism onaEuclidean bundle isanO(m)- bundle isomorphism ifandonlyifitsrestriction toeachpairof bersisan isometry . Example 2.81(Framebundles withstructure ).Inaddition toreduc- ingthestructure group toasubgroup ofGL(m;F),theaforemen tioned structures onvector bundles eachde ne specialframe bundles thathave thesame structure group. Forexample, givenaEuclidean vector bundle (E;h;i)overM,wecande ne theorthogonalframebundleFO(m)E!M, asubbundle ofFEwhichcontainsonlyorthonormal frames. Thestandard berofFO(m)EistheLiegroup O(m),whichadmits anatural action of O(m),de ned bythegroup multiplication. Clearly anytwotrivializations canthenberelated byatransition mapwithvalues inO(m). Thesame remarks apply toanyreduction ofthestructure group ofa vectorbundle: there isalwaysacorresp onding frame bundle, consisting of theframes thatare\preferred" bythestructure inquestion, e.g.symplectic frames, unitary frames, frames ofunitvolume, etc.. Theframe bundle alwayshasthesame structure group asthevector bundle, andits bers arealsodi eomorphic tothisgroup. We'llhavemore tosayaboutthisin thenextsection, onprincipal bundles. Example 2.82(Unitsphere bundles ).ForthebundleSm1E!Mde- nedinExample 2.71withrespecttoaEuclidean vectorbundle (E;h;i), there isanatural reduction ofthestructure group toO(m).Namely ,we restrict toorthonormal frames onEandusethese tode ne localtrivial- izations ofSm1E,sothattransition maps inO(m)actontheunitsphere Sm1Rm. Example 2.83(Symplectic brations ).Wenowgiveanexample where thestructure group isanin nite dimensional subgroup ofHomeo (F).A 2.8.PRINCIP ALBUNDLES 63 symple ctic bration isasmooth berbundle:E!Mwhose standard berisasymplectic manifold (F;!),withstructure group Symp(F;!). Thislastcondition giveseach berExthestructure ofasymplectic man- ifold, suchthatthelocaltrivializations restrict tosymplectomorphisms Ex!fxgF.ThusEcanbethough tofasabundle ofsymplectic man- ifolds thatareallrelated bysmoothly varying symplectomorphisms. A berpreserving di eomorphism f:E1!E2betweentwosuchbundles is aSymp(F;!)-bundle isomorphism ifandonlyifitsrestriction toE1 x!E2 x foreachx2Misasymplectomorphism. Foraverysimple example, onecantakeanysymplectic manifold (F;!) withasymplectomorphism '2Symp(F;!)andde ne themapping torus M'asinExample 2.72.Thisisnowasymplectic bration overS1. Wecannowgivethesimplest possible de nition of\orien tation" fora berbundle. Tosimplify matters, werestrict tothesmoothcase. De nition 2.84. Forasmooth berbundle:E!Mwithstandard berF,anorientation ofthebundle isareduction ofitsstructure group fromDi (F)toDi +(F). Takeamomen ttoconvince yourself thatthismatchestheoldde nition inthecaseofarealvector bundle. Thenextstepisofcourse togivean example ofanon-orien table berbundle|it justsohappensthatthemost popular example isalsothebestknownnon-orien table manifold inthe world. Example 2.85(TheMobius strip).Recall thenon-orien tablelinebun- dle`!S1fromExample 2.12,whereS1isidenti ed withtheunitcircle inCandthe bersarelinesinR2,speci cally `ei=Rcos(=2) sin(=2) R2: Wecande ne aEuclidean structure onthisbundle using thenatural inner productofR2,andthenconsider thecorresp onding \unit diskbundle" D1E=fv2`jhv;vi1g; asmooth berbundle overS1withstandard ber[1;1].Thetotalspace ofD1EistheMobius strip. 2.8Principal bundles We'vealready seensome examples ofprincipal berbundles, namely the framebundlesFGE!Mcorresp onding toanyvector bundleE!M64 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES withstructure groupG.These bundles havethespecialpropertythat theirstandard berandstructure group arethesame LiegroupG,which actsfromtheleftonitselfbygroup multiplication. There isalsoanatural berpreserving action ofGonFGE:toseethis,consider theexample oftheorthonormal frame bundleFO(m)Eforarealvector bundleEwith Euclidean metrich;i.Givenanyorthonormal framep=(v1;:::;vm)2 (FO(m)E)xforExandamatrixA2O(m)withentriesAi j,another such framepA2(FO(m)E)xisobtained byrightmultiplication, pA= v1vm0B@A 1 1A1 m......... A m 1Am m1CA=(v iAi 1;:::;viAi m): Similar remarks apply tobundles ofunitary frames, orientedframes and soforth. Since frame bundles playahelpful roleinunderstanding vectorbundles withextra structure, wegiveaspecialname totheclassof berbundles thatshare thesame specialproperties. Thefollowingisthe rstoftwo equivalentde nitions wewillgive|it applies tosmoothbundles, though itshould beclearhowtogeneralize ittotopological bundles andgroups. De nition 2.86. Asmoothprincip al berbundle:E!Misasmooth berbundle whose standard berisaLiegroupG,suchthatthestructure group reduces toG,acting onitselfbyleftmultiplication. These aresometimes simply called princip albundles,orprincip alG- bundlesifwewanttospecifythestructure group. Thede nition aboveisanalogous tothenotion ofavector bundle as a berbundle withstandard berFmandstructure group GL(m;F)(see Example 2.80).Thisis,ofcourse, notthemostintuitivede nition possible, whichiswhyweoriginally characterized vector bundles interms ofthe intrinsic linear structure onthe bers.Ananalogous de nition ispossible forprincipal bundles:E!M,assoonasweunderstand whatintrinsic structure the berspossess. Foreachx2M,Exisdi eomorphic to aLiegroupG,butnotinacanonic alway|inparticular, there isno specialelemen te2Exthatwecancalltheidentity.Ontheother hand, havingreduced thestructure group toG,we'vechosen aspecialsetoflocal trivializations  :1(U )!U Gthatarerelated toeachother on each berbytheleftaction ofG.Thishasthee ect ofinducing anatural berpreserving rightaction EG!E:(p;g)7!pg; de ned interms ofanylocaltrivialization  (p)=((p);f (p))2U  Gbyf (pg)=f (p)g.Thisisindependen tofthechoice because the 2.8.PRINCIP ALBUNDLES 65 rightaction ofGonitselfcomm uteswiththeleftaction ofthetransition functions (cf.Remark 2.77);indeed ifp2Exforx2U \U , f (pg)=g (x)f (pg)=g (x)f (p)g=f (p)g: Clearly theaction restricts toarightaction ofGoneach berEx,and oneeasily seesthatthisisidenticaltothegroup action onframes thatwe de ned aboveforthespecialcasewhenEisaframe bundle. Twoother importantproperties areworthnoting: (i)Gactsfreely,i.e.without xed points,meaningpg=pforsome p2Eandg2Gifandonlyifgistheidentity.Equiv alently,Gacts freely oneach berEx. (ii)Gactstransitively oneach ber:foranyp;q2Ex,thereexistsg2G suchthatq=pg. Conversely,supposewehaveasmooth berbundle:E!Manda LiegroupGwitha berpreserving smoothrightactionEG!Ethat restricts toafreeandtransitiv eaction oneach ber.These twoproperties oftheaction imply thateach berisdi eomorphic toG.Infact,forany x2M,wecanchooseanopenneighborhoodx2UMandasmooth sections:U!E,anduseittode ne theinverseofalocaltrivialization, 1:UG!1(U):(x;g)7!s(x)g: NowchooseanopencoverM=S U withsmoothsectionss :U !E, andusethese tode ne asystem oflocaltrivializationsf ;U ginthe same manner. Forx2U \U there isaunique elemen tg (x)2Gsuch thats (x)=s (x)g (x),andonecould useanimplicit function theorem argumen ttoshowthatthemapg :U \U !Gissmooth.Then we have  1 (x;g)= (s (x)g)= (s (x)g (x)g)=(x;g (x)g); sog areindeed thetransition maps forthesystemfU ; g.We've provedthatthefollowingisequivalenttoDe nition 2.86. De nition 2.87. Asmoothprincip al berbundleisasmooth berbundle :E!Mtogether withaLiegroupGanda berpreserving rightaction EG!Ewhichrestricts toeach berfreely andtransitiv ely. Thuseach berhastheintrinsic structure ofasmoothmanifold with afreeandtransitiv eG-action; asaresult, the bermustbedi eomorphic toG.Thisistheclosest wecancome togiving the bersanactual group structure without requiring thebundle tobetrivial|indeed, bythesame trickweusedtoconstruct localtrivializations above,wehave:66 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES Proposition 2.88. Asmoothprincip albundle:E!Mistrivial ifand onlyifitadmits aglobalsmoothsections:M!E. Thisisofcourse quite di eren tfromthesituation inavector bundle, whichalwaysadmits anin nite dimensional vectorspace ofglobal smooth sections. Forprincipal bundles there isaone-to-one corresp ondence be- tweensections andtrivializations. Aconsequence isthatanysmoothly varying group structure onthe berswouldtrivialize thebundle, since there wouldthenbeaglobal sections:M!E,taking everypointtothe identityelemen tinthecorresp onding ber. De nition 2.89. GiventwoprincipalG-bundlesE1andE2overthesame baseM,aprincip albundleisomorphism isasmoothmap :E1!E2 whichis berpreserving andG-equiv ariant,i.e. (pg)= (p)g. Exercise 2.90. Notice thatthede nition abovedoesnotexplicitly require tobeaninvertible map. Showhoweverthateveryprincipal bundle isomorphism isautomatic allyinvertible, anditsinverseisanother principal bundle isomorphism. Exercise 2.91. ShowthatasmoothmapbetweenprincipalG-bundles is aprincipal bundle isomorphism ifandonlyifitisaG-bundle isomorphism (seeDe nition 2.79). Clearly ,aprincipal bundle istrivializable ifandonlyifitisisomorphic tothetrivial principal bundle :MG!M; where therightaction is(x;h)g:=(x;hg). Aswe'veseenalready ,anyvector bundle:E!Mwithstructure groupGyields aprincipalG-bundleFGE!M,theframe bundle. Prin- cipalbundles arisenaturally inother contextsaswell. Example 2.92 (TheHopf bration ).Recall thebundle:S3!S2 fromExample 2.73,withstandard berS1,whereS3isregarded asthe unitsphere inC2.Therightaction S3U(1)!S3:((z1;z2);ei)7!ei(z1;z2) givestheHopf bration thestructure ofaprincipal U(1)-bundle. Example 2.93(AnSO(n)-bundle overSn).RegardingSnastheunit sphere inRn+1,thenatural action ofSO(n+1)onRn+1restricts toatran- sitiveaction onSn.Letx0=(1;0;:::;0)2Sn,andde ne thesurjectiv e map :SO(n+1)!Sn:A7!Ax0: 2.8.PRINCIP ALBUNDLES 67 Using theinjectiv ehomomorphism SO(n),!SO(n+1):B7! 10 0B ; wecanregard SO(n)asasubgroup ofSO(n+1)andde ne thenatural rightaction SO(n+1)SO(n)!SO(n+1):(A;B)7!AB: Nowobserv ethatSO(n)isprecisely thesubgroup ofmatrices inSO(n+1) that xthepointx0.ThusifA21(x)foranyx2Sn,wehaveAx0=x andABx0=Ax0=x,sotherightaction is berpreserving. Itisnow simple toverifythattheaction isfreeandtransitiv eoneach ber,thus: SO(n+1)!Snwiththisaction isaprincipal SO(n)-bundle. Aswiththe Hopf bration, thisconstruction isuseful forunderstanding thetopology ofthespaces involved,particularly thespecialorthogonal groups. Similar constructions canbemade fortheunitary andspecialunitary groups. Exercise 2.94. Construct aprincipal U(n)-bundle overS2n+1withtotal space U(n+1). References [Arn89 ]V.I.Arnol0d,Mathematic almethodsofclassic almechanics ,Springer-V erlag, NewYork,1989. [Bre93 ]G.E.Bredon, Topologyandgeometry ,Springer-V erlag, NewYork,1993. [El67]H.I.Elasson, Geometry ofmanifolds ofmaps,J.Di eren tialGeometry 1 (1967), 169{194. [GHL04 ]S.Gallot, D.Hulin, andJ.Lafontaine, Riemannian geometry ,3rded., Springer-V erlag, Berlin, 2004. [Hat02 ]A.Hatcher,Algebraictopology,Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, 2002. [Hir94]M.W.Hirsch,Di erential topology,Springer-V erlag, NewYork,1994. [HZ94]H.Hofer andE.Zehnder, Symple cticinvariants andHamiltonian dynamics , Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 1994. [Lan93 ]S.Lang, Realandfunctional analysis ,3rded.,Springer-V erlag, NewYork, 1993. [Lan99 ] ,Fundamentals ofdi erential geometry ,Springer-V erlag, NewYork, 1999. [MS04]D.McDu andD.Salamon, J-holomorphic curves andsymple ctictopology, American Mathematical Society,Providence, RI,2004. [SU01]R.U.SexlandH.K.Urban tke,Relativity, groups, particles :Specialrelativ- ityandrelativistic symmetry in eldandparticle physics ,Springer-V erlag, Vienna, 2001.68 CHAPTER 2.BUNDLES [Spi65]M.Spivak,Calculus onmanifolds :Amodernapproachtoclassic altheorems ofadvanc edcalculus ,W.A.Benjamin, Inc.,NewYork-Amsterdam, 1965. [Spi99] ,Acomprehensive introduction todi erential geometry ,3rded.,Vol.1, Publish orPerishInc.,Houston, TX,1999. [Ste51]N.Steenro d,TheTopologyofFibreBundles,Princeton UniversityPress, Princeton, N.J.,1951.