Phil Lucht Math & Physics Archive
Home / Math and Physics Files / Math / Wedge World / tensor wedge doc / Support doc files

Alt operator in Dirac Notation REVIEWED

DOCX · 20.6 KB
Open DOCX file

A short working note from the Wedge World tensor wedge project, with dated comments from January and May 2016 about translating between Chapter 7 and Chapter 8 and an Appendix A question. It defines Alt on kets as a signed average over permutations, treats Alt as self-adjoint notation, and shows g = Alt(f) means <g| = <Alt f|. It ends with an exercise and proof that Alt(Alt f) = Alt f using the rearrangement theorem.

AI-written summary; may contain errors.

Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
Notes on Translation from Chapter 7 to Chapter 8. 1.24.16 This is an idea I had installed for a while near the end of Appendix A, but decided it was not really very enlightening so I removed it. // 5.15.16 Things are not crystal clear. I have the detailed Nov 20 Ch 8 translation in hand. First, here is an Appendix A question. I talk about g(1,2) ≡ [Alt(f)](1,2) = f(1,2)-f(2,1) Then I abbreviate that to be g = Alt(f) Does that really have any meaning? What does Alt apply to? In the Dirac world, what happens? <1,2...k| g> = <1,2...k| Alt(f)> ??? ******************************** The Alt operator in Dirac notation In the above discussion, when we say g = Alt(f), what we mean is that, g(1,2,3...k) = Alt(f)(1,2,3...k) = (1/k!) ΣP(-1)P f(P(1),P(2)....P(k) ) . The stripped down statement g = Alt(f) is somewhat vague because there are no labels for Alt to act upon. We can give g = Alt f a more concrete meaning using the Dirac bra-ket notation. Write, g(1,2,3...k) = <g | 1,2...k> <g | = functional Alt(f)(1,2,3...k) = < Alt f |1,2,3...k > < Alt f | = functional Here |1,2,3...k > is a ket in some generic space Gk . Next we define Alt |1,2...k> ≡ (1/k!) ΣP(-1)P |P(1),P(2)...P(k)> < Alt f | 1,2...k> ≡ <f | Alt 1,2...k> Here we are pretending that Alt is a self-adjoint (symmetric) operator AltT = Alt which can be swung for free from the bra space to the ket space. It is just notation. Then we can interpret the stripped statement g = Alt(f) to mean < g| = < Alt f | . When both sides are closed with the ket |1,2,...k> we get the intended result, < g| 1,2,...k> = < Alt f |1,2...k> = <f | Alt 1,2...k> = <f | [(1/k!) ΣP(-1)P |P(1),P(2)...P(k)>] = (1/k!) ΣP(-1)P <f | P(1),P(2)...P(k)> which then says g(1,2..k) = (1/k!) ΣP(-1)P f(P(1),P(2)....P(k) ) In our applications below we will have tensor: | 1,2...k> = | ei, ei ...ei> <T| 1,2...k> = <T|ei, ei ...ei> = Tii...i tensor function: | 1,2...k> = | vi, vi ...vi> <T| 1,2...k> = <T|vi, vi ...vi> = T(vi, vi ...vi) Exercise: Prove that Alt(Alt(f)) = Alt(f) in Dirac notation. That is, show < Alt Alt f | = <Alt f |. Proof: Let | i1,i2...ik> be an arbitrary permutation of | 1,2...k> ( an arbitrary ket in Gk) < Alt Alt f | i1,i2...ik> = < Alt f | Alt | i1,i2...ik> = < Alt f |(1/k!) ΣP(-1)P | iP(1),iP(2)...iP(k)> = <f | Alt | (1/k!) ΣP(-1)P | iP(1),iP(2)...iP(k)> = <f | (1/k!)ΣQ (-1)Q (1/k!) ΣP(-1)P | iPQ(1),iPQ(2)...iPQ(k)> = <f | (1/k!)ΣQ (1/k!) ΣP(-1)PQ | iPQ(1),iPQ(2)...iPQ(k)> = <f | (1/k!)ΣQ (1/k!) ΣP(-1)P | iP(1),iP(2)...iP(k)> // rearrangement theorem = <f | (1/k!) ΣP(-1)P | iP(1),iP(2)...iP(k)> // ΣQ (1/k!) = 1 = <f | Alt | i1,i2...ik> = <Alt f | i1,i2...ik>