Home / Math and Physics Files / Physics / E&M / Electrostatics / Canonical / Charged Bowl Definition Method
Doing the an integral META notes
DOCX · 24.8 KB
Open DOCX file
Meta notes by Phil dated 3.4.11 summarizing a roughly 22-page effort to compute the coefficient a_n in the charged bowl problem in spherical coordinates. They list the failed approaches (parameter differentiation, induction, series, parts) and the one that worked: an integral representation of P_n, a switch in integration order, and parts to remove the arc trig. The result is a_n = (1/π){sin(na)/n + sin[(n+1)a]/(n+1)}, checked in Maple.
AI-written summary; may contain errors.
Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
Doing the an integral META notes PhL 3.4.11
Overview: The basic problem here is to do a certain integral. The major issue is that the integrand includes an arc trig function combined with a Legendre P function, all on a partial interval so that the normal properties of Pn orthogonal polys don't really help. I tried lots of different approaches:
differentiation with respect to a parameter
doing n = 0 and n=1 and then constructing an induction proof
trying parts to get rid of the arc trig function
power series for the arc trig function
power series for the Pn function
elevating P into an integral representation and then doing parts to remove the arc trig
It was the last method that finally worked.
__________________________________________________________________________________
In my notes "canonical -- Section 1_4_1 The Definition Method for the Bowl.doc" I describe the solution of the charged bowl problem in spherical coordinates. The solution potential is given in terms of certain coefficients called an which can be computed according to
an = (1/2) !Syntax Error, Idθ sinθ Pn(cosθ) g(θ) (1)
where
g(θ) = (2/π) {/ + π/2 – sin-1[/] } (2)
In my raw doc "doing the an integral" I show how , when (2) is inserted into (1), we obtain the result
an = (1/π) { sin(na)/n + sin[(n+1)a]/(n+1) } (3)
which is "the classic result" for this problem, though I only know of its appearance in Sneddon and in Canonical. The sad fact is that it took me about 22 pages of fiddling to obtain this result, and that is why I am writing these meta notes. There surely is a faster way to do this integral, but I don't know what it is.
In Section 1 I just restate the desired integral this way
an(b) = (1/π) !Syntax Error, Idz Pn(z) {/ + cos-1[/] } b = cosθ0
I refer to the integral above as In so that an = (1/π)In. It doesn't look like a 22-page problem, does it? I realized early-on that the big issue was going to be doing what is basically an indefinite integral of a Legendre polynomial against a messy arc trig function of a complicated argument. My first thought was trying to find a way to make the cos-1 function go away.
In Section 2 I attempted to "make cos-1 go away" by differentiating an(b) with respect to b. But since b is an integration endpoint, when I evaluate / at z = b it diverges, and the resulting other terms also diverge. I comment about trying an ε-regulation approach, but does not seem viable.
In Section 3 I flail a bit then list off a set of possible methods of proceeding, which I try in later sections.
In Section 4 I try to simplify the arc trig term as much as possible and obtain
In(a)/(4α2) = !Syntax Error, Idy y Pn(2α2y2-1) { 1/ + sec-1y } α = cos(θ0/2)
But of course this complicates the Pn argument and we have no way to "look up" such an integral, at least not in GR7. I may look elsewhere at some point. But for n = 0 I know P0 = 1 and I find that in this case Maple or a lookup provides the arc trig integral and I get the right answer for a0. At least this was a small confidence builder.
In Section 5 I did the case n = 1, and again I got the right answer. The integrals were of the form
yn sec-1y which are all doable in Maple or in lookup. So at this point, I knew that by brute force, I could compute any an I wanted by expanding Pn(z) in powers of z, but I had no general formula for the result.
In Section 6, since I had the n=0 and n=1 results, I pondered an induction proof of the general formula for an. I tried doing this using the Legendre recursion relations, but I could not make it fly.
In Section 7 I pondered my problem integral J=!Syntax Error, Idy y Pn(2α2y2-1) sec-1y. The only sure-fire removal of the arc trig is to do parts integration, but I could not write y Pn(2α2y2-1) as ∂yf(y) for any simple f, so I gave up.
In Section 8 I tried putting Pn(2α2y2-1) into an integral representation. This method required that I do internal integrals of the form ∫ dy y sec-1y /. This path might still work, but I decided not to pursue it. That is to say, I could have found f(y) such that y/ = ∂yf, then I could do parts integration to remove the arc trig. In fact I see now that f = works. This is what I eventually did below.
In Section 9 I ponder using a power series expansion for the arc trig function. This just led to more undoable integrals like !Syntax Error, I dz Pn(z) (z+1)-n-1/2 n = 0,1,2,3..., so again I gave up.
In Section 10 I instead try a power series for Pn(z), since this is how I did my n = 0 and n = 1 cases. The problem here is that I am then faced with !Syntax Error, Idy yn sec-1(y) for arbitrary integer n, but Maple could not do such integrals in general only specific n cases, maybe GR7 could.
In Section 11 I decided to ignore the arc trig term for a while and integrate the first term. I was able to look this integral up in GR7 and got
In(a)first_term = 2 cot(a/2) {cos(na) – cos[(n+1)a]} / (2n+1)
Knowing the correct answer for an, at this point I knew what the arc trig term had to be
S = !Syntax Error, Idz Pn(z) cos-1[/]
= { sin(na)/n + sin[(n+1)a]/(n+1) } – 2 cot(a/2) {cos(na) – cos[(n+1)a]} / (2n+1) ≡ SS
In Section 12 I returned to the arc trig integral which is the first term of I, which I called S. I went back to the Section 8 idea of installing an integral representation for P, and got
S = (/π) !Syntax Error, Idz {!Syntax Error, Idφ cos[(n+1/2)φ]/} cos-1[/]
With the aid of a picture, I could switch the order of integration to get
= (/π) !Syntax Error, Idφ cos[(n+1/2)φ] { !Syntax Error, Idθ sinθ/* cos-1[/] }
where I called the integral appearing here R. I first showed that
R = !Syntax Error, Idz (b-z)-1/2 cos-1[/] b = cosφ a = cosθ0
So here was a chance to dump the arc trig by doing parts. I did these steps
R = - 2 !Syntax Error, Idz [∂z(b-z)1/2] cos-1[/]
= 2 !Syntax Error, Idz (b-z)1/2 ∂z sec-1[/]
since both parts terms vanished (supporting this path of action). Doing the ∂z shown I got
R = !Syntax Error, Idz (b-z)1/2 / [(1+z) ]
I was able to recast this into my corrected GR7 F integral form as follows:
R = (b-a)1/2 (1+a)-1 !Syntax Error, I ds s-1 ( s - [b-a]-1)1/2(s + [1+a]-1)-1
I then used that corrected GR7 form
!Syntax Error, Ids s-λ (s-u)μ-1 (s+β)ν = u-λ (β+u)μ+ν B(λ-μ-ν,μ) F(λ,μ; λ-ν; -β/u)
to show that
R = (π/2) (b-a) (b+1)1/2 (a+1)-1 F(1,3/2; 2; -(b-a)/(1+a))
But then Maple told me that
F(1,3/2; 2; -(b-a)/(1+a)) = = 2(a+1) [ - ] / [(b-a) ]
and I ended up then with this very encouraging result
R = π [ - ]
Note: In some table there must be sitting these definite integrals
R = !Syntax Error, Idz (b-z)-1/2 cos-1[/]
= !Syntax Error, Idz (b-z)1/2 / [(1+z) ]
= π ( - )
Probably it is right there in the GR7 section on algebraic forms, you would shift to get 0 as one endpoint. Well, Section 13 of the raw notes says no gain here.
and therefore I knew that my arc trig term S was given by
S = !Syntax Error, Idφ cos[(n+1/2)φ] [ - ]
= 2 !Syntax Error, Idφ cos[(n+1/2)φ] [cos(φ/2) - cos(a/2) ]
Maple was able to do this integral as follows:
n(n+1)(2n+1) S = [n + 1 - cos(a) n] sin(an) - n sina cos(an)
I knew what my "desired result" for SS was and I entered it into Maple and I found that S = SS, so finally I had the result. This took me about 3 days!