high freq limit of fm gm hm REVIEWED
DOCX · 24.0 KB
Open DOCX file
Appendix D.9 draft by Phil, dated 3.26.05, with a note that it is probably superseded by version 2. It shows fm, gm, hm are symmetric under m to -m, then uses the large-argument Bessel expansion to get high-frequency limits. Results: fm = -2j e^((1+j)(r-a)/δ), gm = 2 e^((1+j)(r-a)/δ), hm ≈ 0, giving standard skin-effect decay and phase. Equation symbols are partly lost in extraction.
AI-written summary; may contain errors. This description is approximate.
Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
Appendix D new piece PhL 3.26.05
I presume this is superseded by version 2.
D.9 Symmetry and high frequency limit of the round wire E fields
Recall from earlier in this appendix that,
Second summary of the E field solutions : Rdc = β'2 = β2 - βd2 (D.2.33)
Ez(r,m) = (1/4) ηm I Rdc (aβ') fm where fm = [ - ] x = β'r xa = β'a
Er(r,m) = (j/4) ηm I Rdc (aβd) gm where gm = [ + - ]
Eθ(r,m) = (1/4) ηm I Rdc (aβd) hm where hm = [ - + + ]
(a) Symmetry of fm, gm and hm.
From NIST (10.4.1) we know that for integer m,
J-m(x) = (-1)mJm(x)
For fm we find that
f-m = [ - ] = - [ - ] = fm
Next,
gm = [ + ]
g-m = [ + ] = [ + ] = gm
hm = [ - ]
h-m = [ - ] = [ - ] = - [ - ] = hm
For large ω we assume β' = β as discussed below (D.2.2).
From NIST 10.17.2, keeping a few leading terms in each inverse power expansion, we have this large x behavior for Jm(x) ,
Jm(x) = (2/πx)1/2 { cos(w) [a0(m) - a2(m)/x2 + O(1/x4)] - sin(w) [a1(m)/x + O(1/x3)] ] }
w = x - mπ/2 -π/4 => e-jw = e-j(x-mπ/2-π/4) = e-jx ejπm/2 ejπ/4
a0(m) = 1 a1(m) = ≡ cm a2(m) = ≡ dm . (D.9.1)
The expansion is in fact valid for all real and complex values of the parameter m, but we shall only use the expansion for m = -1,0,1,2....∞. Using abbreviations cm and dm one gets,
Jm(x) = (2/πx)1/2[ cos(w) (1-dm/x2) - sin(w) (cm/x ) ] . (D.9.2)
Recall that inside the round wire,
δ ≡ = skin depth // ωμσ = 2/δ2 (2.2.20)
β = ej3π/4 (/δ) = (j-1)/δ (2.2.21)
so
x = βr = ej3π/4 (/δ) r = (j-1) (r/δ)
xa = βa = ej3π/4 (/δ) a = (j-1) (a/δ) . (D.9.3)
Since x has a large positive imaginary part for small δ, so does w. Then
cos(w) = [ ejw + e-jw]/2 ≈ (1/2) e-jw
sin(w) = [ ejw - e-jw]/2j ≈ -(1/2j) e-jw = (j/2)e-jw . (D.9.4)
Then our large-x expansion above becomes
Jm(x) = (2/πx)1/2 (1/2) [e-jw (1- dm /x2) - j e-jw (cm /x) ]
= (1/2πx)1/2 e-jw [ 1 -j cm (1/x) - dm (1/x2) + ... ]
= (1/2πx)1/2 e-jx ejπm/2 ejπ/4 [ 1 -j cm (1/x) - dm (1/x2) + ... ] (D.9.5)
It is not hard to show that this agrees with (2.3.5) through order 1/x. Notice that
e-jx = e-j(j-1)(r/δ) = e(1+j)(r/δ)
giving a convenient hybrid form
Jm(x) = (1/2πx)1/2 e(1+j)(r/δ) ejπm/2 ejπ/4 [ 1 -j cm (1/x) - dm (1/x2) + ... ] . (D.9.6)
Using this asymptotic formula, we start examining the ratios that appear in our E field coefficients.
From (D.9.6) we see by inspection that
= e(1+j)(r-a)/δ . (D.9.7)
Next , keeping only leading terms in 1/x and 1/xa,
= e(1+j)(r-a)/δ ej2π/2
≈ - e(1+j)(r-a)/δ [ 1 - jcm+1(1/x) + jcm-1(1/xa) ] . (D.9.8)
Our third object of interest for gm and hm is
= (2m/x) e(1+j)(r-a)/δ ejπ/2
+ j (2m/x) e(1+j)(r-a)/δ [ 1 - jcm (1/x) + j cm-1(1/xa)] . (D.9.9)
For fm we have
= e(1+j)(r-a)/δ ej(-1)π/2
≈ -j e(1+j)(r-a)/δ [ 1 - jcm (1/x) + j cm+1(1/xa)] . (D.9.10)
= e(1+j)(r-a)/δ ej(+1)π/2
≈ +j e(1+j)(r-a)/δ [ 1 - jcm (1/x) + j cm-1(1/xa)] . (D.9.11)
Keeping only the leading terms, we find then that
fm = [ - ] = -2j e(1+j)(r-a)/δ . (D.9.12)
Next, again keep terms through O(1/x),
gm = [ + - ]
= + j (2m/x) e(1+j)(r-a)/δ + e(1+j)(r-a)/δ + e(1+j)(r-a)/δ
= e(1+j)(r-a)/δ [ 2 + 2jm/x ] ≈ 2 e(1+j)(r-a)/δ . (D.9.13)
Finally,
hm = [ - + + ]
= - j (2m/x) e(1+j)(r-a)/δ + e(1+j)(r-a)/δ
- e(1+j)(r-a)/δ [ 1 - jcm+1 (1/x) + j cm-1(1/xa)]
= e(1+j)(r-a)/δ { -2mj/x + 1 - 1 + jcm+1 (1/x) - j cm-1(1/xa) }
= j e(1+j)(r-a)/δ { (cm+1 - 2m) (1/x) - cm-1(1/xa) }
≈ 0 . (D.9.14)
The results are then
Large ω limits of the E field solutions : Rdc = (D.9.15)
Ez(r,m) = (1/4) ηm I Rdc (aβ) fm where fm = -2j e(1+j)(r-a)/δ x = β'r xa = β'a
Er(r,m) = (j/4) ηm I Rdc (aβd) gm where gm = 2 e(1+j)(r-a)/δ
Eθ(r,m) = (1/4) ηm I Rdc (aβd) hm where hm = 0
As observed earlier, the longitudinal current Jz is much larger than the radial current Jr by factor (β/βd).
Notice the standard skin effect behavior both in amplitude and phase for all field components. We saw this earlier in several places:
E(x,ω) = E(0,ω) e-x/δ e-jx/δ . x → (a-r) 1D example (2.1.8)
= e(r-a)/δ r/δ > 3/= 2.1 . (2.3.7)