Home / Math and Physics Files / Physics / Transmission Lines / Notes By Chapter and Appendix / Appendix C Li DC
how is G related to sigma
DOCX · 47.3 KB
Open DOCX file
A short note by Phil dated 6.27.14, in the Appendix C folder of his transmission line notes. It contrasts the resistor relation G = σA/L with the transmission line case, where there is no single A or L. It uses G/C = σd/εd (eq. 4.11.34) to give G = C(σd/εd), then checks dimensions against G + jωC.
AI-written summary; may contain errors.
Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
How is G related to σ ? PhL 6.27.14
Another confusion rather late in the game, a land mine every place I look, it never stops.
In Appendix C I show that
R = 1/(σA)
for a medium of cross sectional area A. This is resistance per unit length.
dimR = ohm-m /m2 = ohm/m
I often apply this to a round wire with A = πa2.
Question: In a transmission line with conductance G of the dielectric, is there a simple relation between G and σd similar to what I have written above?
The answer is not immediately obvious as I first thought it was.
Consider a resistor of area A and length L. We know that
R = 1/(σA) * L ohms
We can certainly think of this "resistor" as being a "conductor" having
G = 1/R = (σA/L) mhos
So this would be the conductance of the above round wire slice for current going left to right. But this has nothing whatsoever to do with the scenario of the transmission line.
In the transmission line scenario, we are interested in this geometry and its cross section
Here there is no A and L as in the previous example. Current flows through the entire infinite medium from one conductor to another. So it would make no sense to look for some formula like
G = σA/L2 // wrong
because as I just said, there is no A or L for this geometry.
The trick here is to remember that
G/C = σd/εd (4.11.34)
Thus, if you want to know G for the above geometry, you have to know C, and then
G = C (σd/εd )
Dimension check:
dim G = far/m * mho/m * m/far = 1/m * mho = mho/m
We also know from writing G +jωC many times that we must have
dimG = dim(ωC) = sec-1 far/m = sec-1 sec/ohm 1/m = mho/m
This is consistent with the fact that
dim (σd/εd ) = mho/m * m/farad = mho/farad = mho * ohm/sec = sec-1 = dim(ω)