Home / Math and Physics Files / Physics / Transmission Lines / Notes By Chapter and Appendix / Appendix R Belden
Precision-Video-Cables-Part-1
PDF · 5 pages · 127.6 KB
Open PDF file
A 2002 Belden Electronics Division paper by Martin J. Van Der Burgt, kept in the Appendix R Belden folder of Phil's transmission line notes. It derives characteristic impedance from the propagation constant and RLC parameters, then discusses input impedance, reflection coefficient, return loss and impedance phase. It uses measured Belden 1505A data to argue that a tight nominal impedance tolerance does not guarantee cable performance.
AI-written summary; may contain errors.
Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
Precision Video Coaxial Cables, Part 1: Impedance Page 1 of 5 Belden Electronics Division, 2002Precision Video Coaxial Cables
Part 1: Impedance
Martin J. Van Der Burgt
Senior Product Engineering Project Manager
Belden Electronics Division
Abstract: Over the years, engineers have come
to identify coaxial cables typically in one of two
ways: either by impedance or RG-type. The
impedance refers to the characteristic ornominal impedance of the cable. Recently, somemanufactures have begun to specify tighterrequirements on the cable. This paper willexamine the nature of characteristic impedance
and to what extent the values are relevant .
Characteristic Impedance: A signal
travels, or propagates, through a transmission
line. Therefore, its behavior is defined by thepropagation constant.
) )( ( CjGLjRj ω ω βαγ + +=+= (1)
Where:γ is the propagation constant
α is the attenuation constant
β is the phase constant
R is the resistance
L is the inductanceG is the conductanceC is the capacitancef = frequency in Hertz
ω= 2πf = radian frequency
The signal can be described in many ways to
better understand its properties and behavior.The natural approach is to divide the signal intovoltage and current. By knowing the properties
of the dielectric material in the transmission line,
we can then determine the intrinsic impedance.Thus, a positively traveling current wave isrelated to a positively traveling voltage wave bythe intrinsic impedance
ωεσωµηjj
+= (2)
Where:η is the intrinsic impedance
µ is the permeability
σis the conductivity
εis the permittivityThe intrinsic impedance is analogous to the
characteristic impedance, Z 0. Characteristic
impedance is a more common term made up ofvalues we often see associated with coaxialcable: Resistance, Inductance, Capacitance, andthe lesser known Conductance.
) () (
0CjGLjRZωω
++= (3)
Solving the characteristic impedance formula
results in the curve and simplification formulas
shown below.
GRAPH 1
At high frequencies, typically greater than 1
MHz, the coaxial cable will approach the “steadystate” value that is referred to as the nominal or
typical impedance. This is the value stated by
most manufacturers as the characteristicimpedance.
Therefore the common expression used to
identify the characteristic impedance of a coax
is:
dD
CLZ ln21
0εµ
π== (4)
and is also simplified to:
=∗=dDVp
VpCZ log100138101670
0 (5)
Precision Video Coaxial Cables, Part 1: Impedance Page 2 of 5 Belden Electronics Division, 2002Where: D is the diameter over the insulation
d is the diameter of the conductor
C is the Capacitance (pF/ft)Vp is the Velocity of Propagation (%)
All of these formulas will provide a good
approximation of the high frequency
characteristic impedance of a coaxial cable.
Traditionally, cable manufacturers have specified
this value as typical or nominal. In some cases,the value had a tolerance. In the case of videocable, a typical value was 75 ± 3 ohms.
Therefore, the characteristic value is between the
value of 72 and 78 ohms or about ± 4%. Someprecision video cables, such as Belden 8281,made with a solid conductor and solidpolyethylene dielectric were specified as ± 1.5ohms, or ± 2%.
Recently, manufacturers have begun to tighten
this impedance tolerance. This is due mainly tothe use of statistical process control and theinfiltration of automation into the manufacturing
process. These improvements allow the cable
manufacture to more consistently meet the 75ohm target. While some manufactures try to usethis specification as a selling point or technicaladvantage, it must be remembered that this is thenominal impedance of the cable and does not
account for the true impedance variations within
the cable.
The graph below illustrates this point. This is an
impedance trace of Belden 1505A PrecisionVideo Cable. Notice how the impedance follows
the theoretical characteristic impedance (red
line), but that the actual impedance does havevariation (blue line).
GRAPH 2
Belden 1505A is specified as 75 ± 1.5 ohms and
does meet the requirement as shown in thisgraph. It is also obvious that the impedance at
individual frequencies is not within the
characteristic value tolerance. So, what then is
the value of a tight characteristic impedancetolerance?
Input Impedance: Input impedance is the
term used to describe the impedance at any given
specific frequency. The term vector impedance is
also sometimes used.
Unfortunately, this impedance is not uniform at
all locations and all frequencies within the cable.After all, this is the REAL world! Therefore,what is really happening within a cable can be
best understood (and measured) by looking at the
reflection coefficient.
When signal traveling in a coax encounters an
impedance mismatch, a portion of the signal will
be reflected back to the source. This reflected
signal has magnitude and phase and is measuredas the reflection coefficient.
01 0201 02
ZZZZej
+−=Γ=Γφ (6)
Where:Γis the reflection coefficient
φis the phase angle
By measuring these signal reflections we can
determine what is happening within the coax.
We can calculate the actual mismatches .
We can also look at the input impedance with
respect to frequency and length using thereflection coefficient. This formula is written interms of the impedance variation within the
transmission line.
ljZZljZZZZ
LLinββ
tantan
00
0++= (7)
Where: Z in is the input impedance
Z0 is the characteristic (or reference)
impedanceZ
L is the load impedance at a specific
location
βtanis the tangent of the phase angle
l is length
The input impedance, Z in, is represented in the
GRAPH 2 as the blue line. Z in represents specific1505A Impedance Magnitude
6570758085
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 01 0 0
Frequency (MHz)Ohms
Precision Video Coaxial Cables, Part 1: Impedance Page 3 of 5 Belden Electronics Division, 2002impedance at specific lengths. Length equates to
wavelength equates to frequency. Therefore,
impedance variation at specific frequencies can
be measured. This will more accurately predictthe electrical performance of the cable.
An extreme example of this can be shown with a
cable that has an excellent characteristic
impedance value (red line), but has terrible
impedance variation within the cable (blue line).This cable, too, meets the same requirement asthe previous example, 75 ± 1.5 ohms.
GRAPH 3
The characteristic impedance value is important
because the cable must be as close to 75 ohms aspossible to minimize reflective losses. But it ismore critical that the variation of impedance
around the nominal be minimal. This is why
impedance is important. Impedance mismatchescause signal reflections.
So, again the question, what then is the value of
a tight characteristic impedance tolerance? It
would seem that the characteristic impedancevalue alone will not guarantee the performancelevel of the cable. Rather it is primarily aspecmanship issue.
Note also that the characteristic impedance value
is a magnitude only measurement, while the
reflection coefficient and input impedancemeasurements both include phase.
Why Magnitude Only: Because of the high
frequency characteristic impedance properties, a
magnitude only measurement allows for
simplified calculations and measurements to beused to represent the relative characteristics ofthe cable. These include TDR (Time DomainReflectometer) impedance, calculated per MIL-C-17G, and calculated per the simplified
formulas.Also, a closer look at the input impedance
equation (7), will show that the phase angle
should be near zero in a “good” cable. This isbecause when you divide a complex number, youactually subtract it. Assuming that the angle isabout the same in both parts of the equation, theend result should be a phase angle about zero
degrees.
Using our equations for reflection coefficient (6)
and input impedance (7), lets look at theimpedance phase with the assumption that thecable has reasonably low impedance variation.
These assumptions reveal that the impedance
phase will be less than ± 20 degrees as can beseen in GRAPH 4.
GRAPH 4
x: Reflection Coefficient Phase
y: Reflection Coefficient Magnitude
z: Impedance Phase
Reflection coefficient for reference
.20 = 14db RL = 1.5:1 VSWR
.15 = 16.5db RL = 1.35:1 VSWR
.10 = 20db RL = 1.22:1 VSWR.05 = 26db RL = 1.11:1 VSWR
.00 = infinite RL = 1.0:1 VSWR
Here we can see that as the reflection magnitude
nears zero, so does the impedance phase. Also,the larger the reflection coefficient magnitude,
the more effect the reflection coefficient phase
has on the impedance phase. So, to minimizeimpedance phase, the reflection coefficient mustbe minimized. This means there must be minimalimpedance variation within the cable.
The input impedance formula does not “limit”
the variation or value of the impedancemagnitude the same way it does the phase.Therefore, we can have a much wider variationImpedance Magnitude
with Periodic Impedance Discontinuities
6570758085
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Frequency (MHz)Ohms
Precision Video Coaxial Cables, Part 1: Impedance Page 4 of 5 Belden Electronics Division, 2002of impedance magnitude as a result. Using the
same assumptions, the impedance magnitude can
vary ± 30 ohms as can be seen in GRAPH 5.
Here we see as the reflection coefficient
magnitude approaches zero, the impedancemagnitude approaches its characteristic value of75 ohms. Also, the lower reflection coefficient
magnitude, the less effect reflection coefficient
phase has on the impedance.
GRAPH 5
x: Reflection Coefficient Phase
y: Reflection Coefficient Magnitude
z: Impedance Magnitude
Minimizing the reflection coefficient magnitude
is the key. Here we truly see that a minimumreflection coefficient magnitude means that thecable should be very near its characteristicimpedance.
So, a perfect cable with minute impedance
variations will have minimal reflectioncoefficient and will be at its characteristicimpedance value. However, a cable withexcellent characteristic impedance can still have
impedance variance of ± 30 ohms. So, again the
question, what then is the value of a tightcharacteristic impedance tolerance?
Actual Cable Measurements: If we apply
this theory and put it together with frequency,
what will the values be?
This data is measured from 300 kHz to 3.0 GHz
using a network analyzer from a randomlychosen spool of Belden 1505A. The samplelength is 100 feet.GRAPH 7
Notice that the impedance grass is about +/- 3
ohms and that the characteristic impedance isabout 74.8 ohms.
GRAPH 8
Notice that as we predicted, the impedance phase
angle is near zero.
Note: This data was collected using a 2.5GHz S-
parameter test set. Actual values above 2.5 GHzmay not be correct.
As we can see from the actual data, our theory
holds true. The impedance magnitude is centered
around the characteristic value and the phase isnear zero. This explains why manufactures reportthe characteristic impedance magnitude only. Itfurther shows that the actual tolerance of theimpedance at any given frequency will be greater
than the characteristic
impedance tolerance
value. (The tolerance is the “grass” around thebest-fit-line value.)
Magnitude and Phase Together: Since
both impedance magnitude and phase can be
affected within the cable, it makes sense to look
at both to determine the true performance of the
1505A Impedance Magnitude
6570758085
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Frequency (MHz)Ohms
1505A Impedance Phase
-5-2.502.55
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Frequency (MHz)Degrees
Precision Video Coaxial Cables, Part 1: Impedance Page 5 of 5 Belden Electronics Division, 2002cable. What measurement and specification will
do this best? This will be discussed in more
detail in Part 2 of our technical series.
Specmanship: So, how tight can the
characteristic value be held? Given excellent
manufacturing practices, materials, productdesigns, SPC implementation, measurement andoperator capabilities, the standard deviation for
characteristic impedance will be 0.5 ohms or
less.
Belden uses a 6-sigma approach when setting
specifications to guarantee the customer that ourproducts will meet or exceed expectations. In
statistical terms, this means that the CpK is
greater than 1.33 or that more than 99.9934% ofproduct falls within the specification limits.
Thus for characteristic impedance, we specify
+/- 3 standard deviations which will be:
Ohms5.15.033 ±=∗±=±σ
Belden’s tolerance for characteristic impedance
for precision video cables is 75 +/- 1.5 Ohms.(Belden products 8281, 1855A, 1505A, 1694A,7731A, and others.)
Given our historical test lab data on this cable,
most cable is within 75 +/- 0.75 ohms. This willbe further illustrated in Part 2.
Conclusion: Characteristic impedance is not a
true representation of the performance and/or
quality of a transmission line. This was best
illustrated in GRAPH 3. This cable has had aperiodic discontinuity introduced into the cable.(A slight compression at 10 foot intervals.)Notice that the input impedance shows thedefect, but characteristic impedance does not. A
TDR measurement may show some of the
defects, depending on how far into the cable youlook, but the resultant value may not.
Therefore, the characteristic impedance value
alone – or it’s tolerance – does not tell the whole
story of cable quality or performance. A
specification for impedance variation, bothmagnitude and phase, is required to demonstratethis capability. This will be the topic of part twoin this series.Part 2: In our next paper, the use of the
reflection coefficient will be discussed, using the
measurements of Return Loss, Voltage Standing
Wave Ratio, and Structural Return Loss to
guarantee cable performance and minimizeimpedance variations within the cable.
About the Author:
Martin J. Van Der Burgt
Marty is a Senior Product Engineering Project
Manager for Belden Electronics Division. His
experience encompasses project managementand product development positions. Hecurrently has responsibility for all design anddevelopment efforts, and manages the day-to-dayactivity of product engineers, for Belden’s
entertainment, service provider, and industrial
product areas. Marty received his Bachelor ofScience Degree in Electrical Engineering(BSEE) from Marquette University, Milwaukee,WI in 1992 and has been with Belden since that
time. He is a member of several professional
organizations and standards bodies, and has hadseveral articles on Audio/Video and RF topicspublished in trade magazines: most recently, aco-authored tutorial on “High-Definition Cablingand Return Loss” in the January 2001 SMPTE
Journal. Marty also holds a FCC Amateur Extra
Class amateur radio license. He and his wifeBeth live in Richmond, IN.
Marty Van Der Burgt
Graphs and data formatted by Carl W. Dole.