Phil Lucht Math & Physics Archive
Home / Math and Physics Files / Physics / Transmission Lines / Notes By Chapter and Appendix / Chapter 5 transverse

general capacitance problem REVIEWED

DOCX · 192.5 KB
Open DOCX file

Phil's working note, dated 1.13.14, on the general two-conductor capacitor problem for his transmission lines notes. It treats the potential as a Dirichlet problem using Stakgold's Green's function solution, gets surface fields and charges, and obtains Smythe's capacitance matrix. With q1 = q and q2 = -q, it inverts the matrix and finds C = 1/(S11+S22-2S12), then checks this with the 2x2 inverse formula.

AI-written summary; may contain errors. This description is approximate.

Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
General Capacitor Problem PhL 1.13.14 Start with this picture in 3D space Viewed from infinity, we see basically two point charges of q1 and q2. The potential of each charge decays as 1/r at so φ(∞) = 0. Here is the Stakgold solution to this treated as a Dirichlet problem: φ(x) = – ∫σ dSξ f(ξ) ∂ξng(x|ξ) // Stakgold (6.81) . (1.5.11) = – ∫C1 dSξ V1 ∂ξng(x|ξ) – ∫ C2 dSξ V2 ∂ξng(x|ξ) – 0 = V1 F1(x) + V2F2(x) . Then compute the E field at each conductor surface according to En(x)|C1 = - ∂nφ(x)|C1 = - ∂n [V1 F11(x) + V2F12(x)] ≡ V1G11(x) + V2G12(x) En(x)|C2 = - ∂nφ(x)|C2 = - ∂n [V1 F21(x) + V2F22(x)] ≡ V1G21(x) + V2G22(x) where all functions are known. Then write n1(x) = ε En(x)|C1 = εV1G11(x) + εV2G12(x) n2(x) = ε En(x)|C2 = εV1G21(x) + εV2G22(x) Then integrate to get q1 = C1 ds' n1(x) = εV1H11 + εV2H12 = V1 C11 + V2C12 q2 = C2 ds' n1(x) = εV1H21 + εV2H22 = V1C21 + V2 C22 where suddenly Smythe's mutual capacitances appear. Then we have = or q = C V Invert to get = C-1 = S = Now set q1 = q and q2 = -q and then = C-1 = = q = q so then V1 = q (S11- S12) V2 = q (S21- S22) And then V = V1- V2 = q (S11- S12) - q (S21- S22) = q [ (S11- S12) - (S21- S22)] = q [S11- S12 - S21+ S22] = q [S11+ S22 - 2S12] so the capacitance is given by C = 1/(S11+ S22 - 2S12) Great, now I want to see someone verify this whole idea of mine. By the way, C = S-1 = cof(CT)/det(C) Now it happens that I know how to invert a 2x2 matrix. Suppose we have C = Then S = C-1= /det(C) Then S11 = C22 /det(C) S22 = C11 /det(C) C = 1/(S11+ S22 - 2S12) C-1 = (S11+ S22 - 2S12) = (C22+ C11 - 2[-C12])/det(C) = And then C = And here is a slight with 100% verification!! hurray!