f(z)f(-z)=K solution
DOCX · 38.5 KB
Open DOCX file
Short note by Phil dated 10.11.10 that finds the most general solution of f(z)f(-z)=K (K nonzero) with f analytic at z=0. Any odd analytic function fodd gives feven = ±sqrt(K + fodd^2), and f = fodd + feven. It checks power-series coefficients, works examples (z, A sin Bz, e^{iBz}, e^{Bz}), and gives a proof by even/odd decomposition. Some formulas were lost in text extraction.
AI-written summary; may contain errors. This description is approximate.
Extracted text (machine-read; may contain errors)
Find the solution of f(z)f(-z) = K where f(z) is analytic at z=0 PhL 10.11.10
Here is the answer (we assume K ≠ 0)
Theorem: The most general solution of f(z)f(-z) = K where f(z) is analytic at z = 0 is given by:
Start with any odd function of z analytic at z = 0, call that function fodd(z). [ok]
Note: this implies fodd(0) = 0 [ok]
Define the even function feven(z) ≡ . [ok]
Note: since = , we are away from the SQRT branch point so feven(z) is analytic at z=0. [ok]
Then either f(z) as follows will solve the equation f(z)f(-z) = K :
f(z) = fodd(z) ± [need to prove this]
One small example is fodd(z) = sh(Bz) and K=1 in which case
f(z) = sh(Bz) ± ch(Bz) = ±e±Bz and you can see that in either sign case, f(z)f(-z) = 1. [ok]
If you are given f(z), you can find fodd(z) by doing some simple algebra. The result is
fodd(z) = [ f(z)2 - ] / [2 f(z)] [pend]
In our last example, this gives fodd = [ e±2Bz - 1] / [±2 e±Bz] = ±(1/2)[ e±Bz - e-+Bz] = ±sh(±Bz) = sh(Bz).
Proof of Theorem:
Decompose f(z) = feven(z) + fodd(z)
where feven(z) = [ f(z) + f(-z)]/2
fodd(z) = [ f(z) – f(-z)]/2 [ok]
f(z)f(-z) = K [ok]
[feven(z) + fodd(z)] [feven(-z) + fodd(-z)] = K [pend]
[feven(z) + fodd(z)] [feven(z) – fodd(z)] = K
[feven(z)]2 - [fodd(z)]2 = K
[feven(z)]2 = K + [fodd(z)]2
feven(z) = ±
Just run the last lines in reverse for a proof. Examples for K = 1 appear in the text below.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Question: If someone tells you that the complex function f(z) has the property f(z)f(-z) = 1, and is analytic at z = 0, then what can you say about the solution f(z) ?
An interesting question. If f(z) is analytic at z = 0, we can expand it like so
f(z) = a0 + a1z + a2z2 + a3z3 + a4z4 ... [ok]
Our condition then becomes
(a0 + a1z + a2z2 + a3z3 + a4z4 ...)( a0 – a1z + a2z2 – a3z3 + a4z4 ...) = 1 [ok]
We can then require that each coefficient of a z power match. [ok] The function on the LHS is even in z, [ok] so we know all the odd terms have manifestly vanishing coefficients, leaving only even terms. [??] Let's have Maple take care of this expansion for us:
The result is good through the z8 term because adding more terms to the series O(z9) cannot affect this term. [ok] We see a pattern here.
a02 = 1 so at least we know a0 is a phase, and we just keep it as a0.
a1 is not determined, it is a free constant.
a2 = a12/(2a0) so a2 is determined.
a3 is a free constant.
a4 = [2 a1a3- a22]/(2a0) so a4 is determined.
a5 is a free constant
a6 = .... so a6 is determined
a7 is a free constant
a8 = ... so a8 is determined.
What is all this telling us? [not sure] Suppose we break f(z) into its even and odd parts:
f(z) = feven(z) + fodd(z)
where
feven(z) = Σn=0,2,4∞ anzn
fodd(z) = Σn=1,3,5∞ anzn [ok]
We find that fodd(z) can be anything you like, and this then forces a certain feven(z). Let's go back to our original equation then which says f(z)f(-z) = 1 :
[feven(z) + fodd(z)] [feven(-z) + fodd(-z)] = 1 [ok]
[feven(z) + fodd(z)] [feven(z) – fodd(z)] = 1 [ok]
[feven(z)]2 - [fodd(z)]2 = 1 [ok]
[feven(z)]2 = 1 + [fodd(z)]2 [ok]
feven(z) = [ok]
So here we see our claim more clearly. Select any fodd you want, then feven is given by the above expression.
Example 1:
fodd(z) = z
feven(z) = [ok]
f(z) = + z [ok]
f(-z) = – z [ok]
f(z)f(-z) = [+ z][ – z] = (1+z2) - z2 = 1 [ok]
Well I'll be a monkey's uncle! [why?]
Example 2:
fodd(z) = Asin(Bz)
feven(z) = [ok]
f(z) = + Asin(Bz)
f(-z) = - Asin(Bz)
f(z)f(-z) = 1 OK
Example 3:
fodd(z) = i sin(Bz)
feven(z) = = cos(Bz)
f(z) = cos(Bz) + i sin(Bz) = eiBz
f(z)f(-z) = 1 OK
Example 4:
fodd(z) = sh(Bz)
feven(z) = = ch(Bz)
f(z) = ch(Bz) + sh(Bz) = eBz
f(z)f(-z) = 1 OK
So when I started this little problem, I thought surely eBz was the only possible solution where B is some complex number, and then f(z)f(-z) = eBz e-Bz = 1. I was wrong!
Summary:
Theorem: The most general solution of f(z)f(-z) = 1 where f(z) is analytic at z = 0 is given by
Start with any odd function of z analytic at z = 0, call that function fodd(z).
Note: this implies fodd(0) = 0
Define the even function feven(z) ≡ .
Note: since = 1, we are away from the SQRT branch point so feven(z) is analytic at z=0.
Then f(z) as follows will solve the equation f(z)f(-z) = 1 :
f(z) = fodd(z) +
One small example is the case fodd(z) = sh(Bz) in which case f(z) = eBz.
Proof
Decompose f(z) = feven(z) + fodd(z)
where feven(z) = [ f(z) + f(-z)]/2
fodd(z) = [ f(z) – f(-z)]/2
f(z)f(-z) = 1
[feven(z) + fodd(z)] [feven(-z) + fodd(-z)] = 1
[feven(z) + fodd(z)] [feven(z) – fodd(z)] = 1
[feven(z)]2 - [fodd(z)]2 = 1
[feven(z)]2 = 1 + [fodd(z)]2
feven(z) =
Generalization: To solve f(z)f(-z) = K, just replace 1 by K everywhere above.